May 1, 2016


 From SGT
Friends, this interview with JS Mineset’s Bill Holter is not for the faint of heart. It contains information you absolutely must share with your friends and family, no matter how closed-minded they are, no matter how many times you may have tried to warn them in the past. This may well be their last chance to protect themselves from an economic calamity so severe that they willnever recover.
Holter warns, “I think what we are looking at is an EVENT that you’re not going to be able to recover from. If this market snaps and the markets close, and you’re not in position, you’re out. You’re out for the rest of your life. This is going to be an EVENT that you can’t recover from.”
As readers of SGT Report know, Silver is the best performing commodity asset of 2016 thus far, and there are some very quantifiable, very important reasons for it. This may well be YOUR last chance to protect yourself from what’s coming.

Unusual Forecasts ~ Interview with Jim Willie

Will Lehr of interviews Jim Willie of
Join us for a 2 hour session with Jim Willie, the Golden Jackass. This one is all over the place!
Don’t miss part 2 as we cover some fantastic info including censorship, dissent, and the threats of the criminal elite. Lucky for us technology is changing faster than the government can regulate or control it.

We discuss current events, geopolitics, the precious metals breakout, unusual forecasts, and more. In the end Jim opens up and gives us some personal connection.
The western word has gone broke, and added fuel to the fire over the last 5 years. Jim believes deficits will force bail ins and that the IRA, 401k, pension marketplace will be the target.
We have seen an impressive metals breakout in the last few weeks. Jim explains how gold will break open the door for new highs while silver will chase at a faster rate. Jim gives us a nice technical analysis on the current breakout complete with graphs. Jim called this breakout in his 4/26 article:
“Silver leads the precious metals breakout in impressive fashion. The Cup & Handle pattern indicates an 18 target to be reached very quickly. Both following charts exhibit a constructed launching pad for an assault on the $20 level.”
We discuss the fundamentals of the physical silver market; the recycling industry is gone. Jim shares a unique suspicion regarding the recent JP Morgan physical silver horde. China might be forcing the US government to use JPM as the broker to replace the undelivered silver from a lease to the US in 1999.
We get a statistical breakdown on voter fraud- and it doesn’t stop there. Jim analyzes interest rate fraud, bond fraud, gold fraud, and more.
Jim give us a breakdown of the current actions of the terror management squad. The playbook is obvious. Jim loves to discuss correct forecasts. He especially likes to discuss unusual forecasts.
From the basics for forensic analysis in the case of faked deaths to secret motives behind the global elite, Jim illustrates how he pieces the elements together to form a cohesive forecast.
And Much More….
Good and evil, asset seizures, free markets, and more…
Don’t miss part 2 as we cover some fantastic info including censorship, dissent, and the threats of the criminal elite. Lucky for us technology is changing faster than the government can regulate or control it.
Jim gives us some explanation of his ‘switchboard’ of information. From clients to connected sources to general website visitors, Jim is consistently pinged with unique and pertinent information.
The new dollar introduction will coincide with a bail in. It will be an outright colossal theft and be blamed on the financial collapse.
new logo banner 2

Apr 27, 2016

NATO-Linked Think Tanks In Control of Europe’s Refugee Policy – F. William Engdahl

Apparently it's in somebody's interest to flood Europe with foreign immigrants 

From RussiaInsider,
By F. William Engdahl

A flood of uncontrolled war refugees from Syria, Libya, Tunisia and other Islamic countries destabilized by Washington’s ‘Arab Spring’ Color Revolutions, has created the greatest social dislocation across the EU from Germany to Sweden to Croatia since the end of World War II. By now it has become clear to most that something quite sinister is afoot, something which threatens to destroy the social fabric of the very core of European civilization. What few realize is that the entire drama is being orchestrated, not by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, or by faceless EU bureaucrats of the Brussels EU Commission. It is being orchestrated by a cabal of NATO-linked think tanks.
Last October 8, 2015 amid the great stream of hundreds of thousands of refugees flooding into Germany from Syria, Tunisia, Libya and other lands, a newly self-confident German Chancellor Angela Merkel proclaimed on a popular German TV program, “I have a plan.” She took the occasion to take a sharp dig at coalition partner, Bavarian CSU head, Horst Seehofer, a stauch critic of Merkel’s open arms refugee position since spring 2015 that saw more than one million refugees enter Germany last year alone.
Since that point, with iron-hard resolve, the German Chancellor has defended the criminal Erdogan regime in Turkey, an essential partner in her “plan.”
Most of the world has looked on with astonishment as she ignored principles of free speech and decided to prosecute publicly a well-known German TV comedian, Jan Böhmermann, for his satirical remarks about the Turkish President. They were astonished as the symbol of European democracy, the German Chancellor, chose to ignore Erdogan’s imprisonment of opposition journalists ands his shutting of Turk opposition media as he proceeded with plans to establish a de facto dictatorship rule within Turkey. They were puzzled as Berlin’s government chose to ignore overwhelming proof that Erdogan and his family were materially aiding and abetting ISIS terrorists within Syria who were in fact creating the war refugee crisis. They were astonished to see her push through an EU committment to give Erdogan’s regime billions of euros to supposedly deal with the refugee flow from Turkish refugee camps across the border into EU neighbor land, Greece and beyond.
The Merkel Plan
All of those seemingly inexplicable actions from the once-pragmatic German leader appear to go back to her embrace of a 14-page document prepared by a network of pro-NATO think-tanks, brazenly titled “The Merkel Plan.”
What the newly-self-confident German Chancellor did not tell her hostess, Anne Will, or her viewers was that “her” plan was given to her just four days earlier, on October 4, in a document already titled The Merkel Plan, by a newly-created and obviously well-financed international think-tank called the European Stability Initiative or ESI. The ESI website showed that it had offices in Berlin, Brussels and in Istanbul, Turkey
Suspiciously, the authors of the ESI plan titled their plan as if it had come from the German Chancellor’s office and not from them. More suspicious is the contents of The Merkel Plan of ESI. In addition to already taking more than one million refugees in 2015, Germany should “agree to grant asylum to 500,000 Syrian refugees registered in Turkey over the coming 12 months.” In addition, “Germany should accept claims from Turkey…and provide safe transport to successful applicants…already registered with the Turkish authorities…” And finally, “Germany should agree to help Turkey obtain visa-free travel in 2016.”
That so-called Merkel Plan was a product of US and NATO-linked think tanks and of governments of NATO member countries or prospective members. The maxim “follow the money trail” is instructive in this case to see who really runs the EU today.

Apr 26, 2016

Once Libya, Now Take Your Pick: R2P Equals Right-2 Profit

From Journal-Neo, 24.04.2016
By Seth Ferris

Let us examine what happened in Libya in 2011. The NATO and US operation conducted there, on the basis of UN Security Council Resolution 1973, was supposed to bring about stability by establishing a no fly zone. Instead it ended up destroying the country – but no one seems to care, because it was the opportunity to intervene, not the end result, which actually mattered.

Over the last thirty years, a number of new states have been put on the map, such as South Sudan, Kosovo and Montenegro. American exceptionalism, however, packaged, however achieved and for whatever reason, is usually considered a good thing in principle-at least by Americans. The problem, globally, is that American exceptionalism has increasingly come to have negative connotations.

It is therefore doubly unfortunate that the latest trend is not to create nations but destroy them, with military interventions which ruin the infrastructure of the country as well as deposing its government while leave nothing in their place, as we are currently seeing in Iraq and Syria.

Such interventions destroy the resources we assume they are designed to grab in the same operations. So why create all the trouble for no apparent gain? Because ultimately, despite the accusations of the likes of former Ambassador Craig Murray, wars in faraway countries are not about resources. They are about domestic defence procurement – what it is, what it isn’t, and what the politicians don’t want you to know about it.

Apr 25, 2016

Bernie Sanders Is A "Testament To American Suckerdom"

From ZeroHedge, 04/24/2016
by Jeff Deist via The Mises Institute,

This article from the Free Beacon about Bernie Sanders being kicked out of a “hippie commune” in 1971 reads like something from The Onion. Bernie, age 30(!) at that point, was like a bad college roommate who preferred late night political discussions to housework and cleaning. And based on uncontested reports of his nonexistent career path, we can safely assume he contributed nothing to the communal finances.

That Bernie Sanders - a shiftless layabout who openly joined socialist and communist groups - can even sniff the US presidency is a testament to American suckerdom and an enduring fetish for collectivism among rich westerners.

But the question of communes is an interesting one for libertarians. Under what conditions, with what people, and for how long can collectivism work? Economics helps explain why communal living (beyond family groups) tends to fail because of bad incentives, but it alone doesn’t explain the political and sociological elements. 

Voluntary communal living is not per se impossible, in small homogeneous groups with close-knit identities and deeply shared values. Israeli kibbutzim are one keen example, although most today employ some elements of private property ownership and differing wages for various jobs. Amish and Mennonite communities in the US are another, with the interesting feature of a “rumspringa” period where young people are permitted to sample modern life before deciding to commit to the church and community.   

Milton Friedman, writing in Chapter 5 of Free to Choose, had this to say about kibbutz communities in Israel:
Egalitarians in the United States may object that the fewness of communes and their fragility reflect the opprobrium that a predominately “capitalist” society visits on such communes and the resulting discrimination to which they are subjected. That may be true for the United States, but as Robert Nozick has pointed out, there is one country where that is not true, where, on the contrary, egalitarian communes are highly regarded and prized. That country is Israel. 
Everyone is free to join or leave a kibbutz, and kibbutzim have been viable social organizations. Yet at no time, and certainly not today, have more than about 5 percent of the Jewish population chosen to be members of a kibbutz. That percentage can be regarded as an upper estimate of the fraction of people who would voluntarily choose a system enforcing equality of outcome in preference to a system characterized by inequality, diversity, and opportunity.
Murray Rothbard, critiquing Karl Polanyi's The Great Transformation, had a typically trenchant view:
Anyone who wants to can, in a free society, even join a voluntary commune, like Brook Farm or an Israeli kibbutz, and lead as blissfully communistic life as he or she wishes. Since everyone still has the option to do so, since anyone has the option to go off to a desert island or join a commune, why is Polanyi bitter about the market?
Although US communes enjoyed a resurgence in the 1960s and 70s, their memberships never approached 5% of the population. And their abrupt decline demonstrates that communal living is both hard to sustain and hard to pass on to children.

What must be emphasized is this: in Ron Paul’s America, or Hans Hoppe’s private law society, voluntary “socialist” arrangements would be perfectly allowable and legal. But libertarian communities are never permitted in statist societies.

Apr 14, 2016

The Fed’s “Four Horsemen” Unite - Jeff Nielson

From Sprottmoney:

April 14, 2016
If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered…I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies…The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.
- Thomas Jefferson, 1802

A private (central) bank does control the issue of U.S. currency: the Federal Reserve, as is the case with most of the nations of the world. These bankers do conspire to “first inflate” and “then deflate.” This is what regular readers know as our bubble-and-crash cycles , which now seem to occur in more-or-less fixed eight-year intervals.

The people are relentlessly being deprived of all property. The Middle Class is nearly extinct , having devolved into the Working Poor. Our children are literally “waking up homeless,” with millions of Homeless People now struggling to survive across North America.

Should we regard Thomas Jefferson as a prophet, or simply as a sober individual engaging in logical extrapolation? History strongly suggests the latter interpretation, via a “warning” of an entirely different nature.

Give me control of a nation’s money, and I care not who makes its laws.
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744 – 1812)

That is what the Rothschild patriarch boasted, but this is not what he really meant. Give me control of a nation’s money, and I make its laws. Control the purse strings of any government and you control the government.

Mayer Rothschild was a contemporary of Thomas Jefferson, and Jefferson was a scholar. He knew what this oligarch meant with his boast. He then took that boast and expanded it into the true horror that it represented.

Central banks exist to steal. Indeed, they have a literal “license to steal” via the power of the printing press. In this area, too, we have a famous source to offer us guidance.

In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation.

Central banks create inflation; it is virtually their sole function. The central bankers constantly whine that “inflation is too low,” i.e., they aren’t confiscating our savings (stealing our wealth) as fast as they would like. But first they instruct our subservient governments to lie about the rate of inflation so that the People are unaware of the rate at which their wealth is being stolen.

Central bankers steal out of the pockets of the people and funnel that stolen wealth into the vaults of the oligarchs who control these presses – oligarchs like the Rothschilds . In the approximate 100 years since the Federal Reserve was entrusted with managing and “protecting” the U.S. dollar, it has lost roughly 99% of its value through the Fed’s manufactured “inflation.”

This still needs to be translated for the benefit of some readers. In the century in which the Federal Reserve has controlled the U.S. printing press, 99% of all the wealth stored in the U.S. dollar has been stolen from the People and handed to the oligarchs, a financial crime syndicate which readers know as the One Bank .

Adding literal injury to insult, the oligarchs conned (commanded?) our puppet governments to borrow our own currencies from these corrupt central banks. Thus, while all the wealth of the People was being stolen via the paper fraud of central banks, our governments, and thus the People as well, have simultaneously been enslaved with debt .

With one hand, the central banks (and central bankers) steal all our wealth. With their other hand, they attach shackles of debt around our throats, all on behalf of their Masters. These central bankers are guilty of the worst economic crimes against humanity, except for the deeds of the banking oligarchs themselves.

Recently, the four worst Criminals were all trotted out on a single stage: Paul Volcker, Alan Greenspan, B.S. Bernanke, and Janet Yellen. Greenspan’s and Bernanke’s crimes are obvious. They are the Great Inflators. Undoubtedly, there will be many readers confused as to why Paul Volcker is listed as one of “the four worst Criminals.”

Apr 12, 2016

SOROS PROPOSES DEBT SCHEME TO PAY FOR EUROPE’S ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS - Advises EU states to use money to combat “anti-immigrant sentiment”

From - APRIL 12, 2016
By Kurt Nimmo
George Soros has called for imposing a new debt burden on Europeans to pay for the destruction of their countries.
“EU leaders need to embrace the idea that effectively addressing the crisis will require ‘surge’ funding, rather than scraping together insufficient funds year after year. Spending a large amount at the outset would allow the EU to respond more effectively to some of the most dangerous consequences of the refugee crisis,” writes the billionaire “philanthropist” for The New York Review of Books.
In addition to an increase in VAT (value added tax) “contributions” from member states, Soros calls for states to borrow money from financial markets, thus adding to a debt obligation that has swamped the continent and produced the so-called “eurozone crisis” responsible for anemic economic growth and unemployment.
“The EU presently enjoys a triple-A credit rating that is underused and that allows it to borrow in the capital markets on very attractive terms. And with global interest rates at near historic lows, now is a particularly favorable moment to take on such debt,” he writes.
Soros advises EU member states to borrow the money “very quickly” to avoid political opposition.
In addition to spending borrowed money on massive welfare programs for illegal migrants, Soros believes governments need to use the cash infusion to “respond more effectively to some of the most dangerous consequences of the refugee crisis—including anti-immigrant sentiment in its member states that has fueled support for authoritarian political parties.”
Political parties opposed to the tidal wave of immigrants entering Europe from the Middle East and Africa have gained power in Germany, France, Austria, Denmark, Finland, Italy and other EU member states. In addition to opposition to unchecked immigration, many of the political parties are aligned against the European Union and the political elite.
“From Spain to Sweden to Poland, populist protest parties are spreading,” Josef Joffe wrote in February for the German newspaper Die Zeit. “In America the ‘mainstream media’ is the enemy. Here it is [called] the ‘Lügenpresse [lying press].’ Here they rage against ‘those at the top,’ there against the ‘elites.’”
Soros is calling for Europeans to pay for the effort to undermine opposition to immigration and the political elite. Huge majorities in Europe oppose immigrationglobalist trade deals, and rule by unelected authoritarian EU grandees.