Aug 27, 2015

The Death of Central Banking, Government and The Birth of The Voluntary Era (Part1)

Coming Money Trust

I had spent a few weeks planning and halfway through writing an elaborate post on the evolution of banking to central banking and the inner workings of secret cartels, but I got so bored I couldn’t be bothered finishing it… In these dying days of Socialist central banking, I really don’t think it matters anyway… I find Banking and Interventionist Macro Economics to be so boring lately… So now we can proceed to more exciting stuff…

Historic Trends
If you have studied History in any depth whatsoever, then you will find certain definitive trends in action… For example you will find a definite trend of centralization and decentralization which ebbs and flow throughout
From the Fall of the centralized Roman Empire (27BC – 476AD) which included Europe and vast swathes of the East and Africa; while the Byzantine Empire (330-1453) continued in the East, Western Europe shattered into a thousand decentralized localized states, ultimately under the control of the Catholic Church, otherwise known as Western Christendom… This decentralized and localized social order and hierarchical structure lasted roughly a thousand years, until the end of Feudalism and natural aristocracy and the rise of Absolutist and Constitutional Monarchies in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, which jostled with the Catholic Church for power and control following the Protestant Reformation (1517-1648)

 Monarchies by centralizing power form what we would call the Modern Nation States… With the advent of the disastrous French Revolution (1789-1799) and culminating with the end of Western Civilization in World War One (1914-1918), the monarchies of Western Europe are dismantled to be replaced with the modern Democratic Nation States

Co-inciding with the centralization of State power (as comparatively weak as it was compared to today), another trend to observe during the Industrial Revolution (1750-1850), was the centralization of the means of production, in this instance manufacturing and agriculture… The population explosion in Western Europe during this time and increasing mechanization of agriculture, led to a mass exodus of people from the country to form new towns and cities… If you are talking about the coal seams of the South Wales Valleys, or the textile and manufacturing towns and cities of England and Scotland, the trend was the same; a centralization of populations in factory towns and around mine collieries… To be clear this centralization was a necessary and organic consequence of the population boom, the mechanization of agriculture boosting hugely the productivity needed to feed this booming population, with the excess booming population employed in factories creating capital goods (machines) and finished goods for exchange with the agricultural countryside… Add to this a network of trains and roads connecting the countryside with urban populations, and you have the Industrial Revolution in a nutshell…

As a natural by product of this population boom and the higher productivity garnered by centralization and mechanization of the means of production, came untold riches to the peoples of Western Europe… And where you have wealth and riches, you will necessarily have banks, as a storage and lending facility of money within this Industrial Revolution… It is no surprise then, that the rise of Banking in Western Europe happened during the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries… So we have centralized Nation States, Industry and Banking leading up to the madness of the Twentieth Century, and a definitive trend

The Inherent Weakness of Centralization

While all the above is effusive to the advantages and really the necessity of centralization at that time in Europe’s history for its booming population to maintain and exceed its standard of living, you also need to acknowledge that there are also inherent weaknesses in centralization… Centralization of States leads to a monopoly of power over a certain territorial area, upon which a Ruler can impose laws, and demand tribute (taxes) for administration of these laws… Centralization of Industry makes it easier to control, as the State can pass laws and regulations enforcing Labour Unions and all sorts of bureaucratic diktats on hardworking business owners, and on the other hand it affords parasitic business owners for the State to intervene in instituting “Licences” and “Regulations” effectively barring and outlawing competition, by lobbying and bribing corrupt State officials…

Banking is of course like any other industry, albeit by far the most dangerous to be centralized, as the industry of money directly affects all other industries… The fullest expression of this centralization is Central Banking, where individual private banks collude to have the State enforce the creation of a Central Bank in the aftermath of some great banking crisis created by the same bankers obviously, for purposes of centralizing risk by means of a “lender of last resort” and more importantly centralizing the public money supply in the hands of a small cartel of private bankers… Once a Central Bank is instituted with control of the money supply, it is only a matter of time before scarce money (gold and silver) is replaced with infinite Fiat paper money and extension of credit, so that the State can fund Wars and Welfare for the benefit of a small kleptocratic psychopathic Elite

As the above should make clear, the biggest failing of Centralization is that is allows a small Elite of very powerful shadowy people, first control of the banks, then control of the State and its monopoly of violence and coercion upon society by means of bribes and blackmail, and then control of all other industries eventually through State power and control of the money supply… Power, compulsion and wealth now reside in the hands of a small clique, from where they can control every aspect of every individual, every family, every business; otherwise known as Central Planning, or Socialism… Welcome to the Modern World…

The Fatal Flaw of Centralization

Aug 7, 2015


Judicial Watch has published a selection of formerly classified documents obtained from the U.S. Department of Defense and State Department through a federal lawsuit.

A 2012 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document sates that the West will facilitate the rise of the Islamic State (ISIS) 'in order to isolate the Syrian regime'.

2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document



According to Levant Report:
"Forensic evidence, video evidence, as well as recent admissions of high-level officials involved (see former Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford’s admissions here and here), have since proven the State Department and CIA’s material support of ISIS terrorists on the Syrian battlefield going back to at least 2012 and 2013."

2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document


Robert Ford with ISIS.

According to Levant Report:

"For a clear example of 'forensic evidence': see UK-based Conflict Armament Research’s report which traced the origins of Croatian anti-tank rockets recovered from ISIS fighters back to a Saudi/CIA joint program via identifiable serial numbers."

2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document


According to Levant Report:

"The DIA report makes the following summary points concerning ISIS:

"Al-Qaeda drives the opposition in Syria.

"The West identifies with the opposition (al Qaeda).

"The establishment of a 'Salafist Principality' in Eastern Syria is 'exactly' what the external powers supporting the opposition want (identified as 'the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey') in order to weaken the Assad government.

"'Safe havens' are suggested in areas conquered by Islamic insurgents along the lines of the Libyan model (which translates to so-called no-fly zones)"

2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document


The DIA responds to Levant Report.
The Relationship Between Obama And ISIS: The Evidence!

Aug 6, 2015

Moment whip in Sir Edward Heath’s Government revealed that his job was to cover up scandals ‘involving small boys’ and the PM kept details in a ‘dirt book’

  • Tim Fortescue served as a whip in Heath’s government from 1970 to 1973 
  • He claimed he hushed up MPs’ scandals to store up ‘brownie points’
  • He said: ‘It might be debt, it might be… a scandal involving small boys’
  • Heath himself kept MPs’ secrets in a ‘dirt book’ to keep them in line 
By Martin Robinson for MailOnline
This is the chilling moment Sir Edward Heath’s Commons enforcer revealed part of his job had been to cover up ‘scandals involving small boys’.
Tim Fortescue, an assistant whip while Sir Edward was prime minister, was part of the so-called ‘Westminster Secret Service’ who would hide dirty secrets for MPs and blackmail them for loyalty.
Mr Fortescue, who died in 2008, admitted Ted Heath had encouraged him to compile a ‘dirt book’ on Tory colleagues and would try to ‘get a chap out of trouble’ before demanding favours in return.
Sir Edward, who has now himself been accused of child abuse, also kept his own to keep his MPs in line.
Support: Whip Tim Fortescue, left, admitted that while serving Sir Edward Heath, right while in power, paedophilia was covered up to blackmail MPs into supporting the government [more + video…]
Jill Dando Murdered by Britain’s VIP Paedophiles

French Elite Say Either Germany Leaves the Euro or Economic Chaos is their Fate

From Martin Armstrong, August 6, 2015:

The French elite are now calling for a German exit from the euro as a solution since the rest of them are heading into Marxist la-la land. The Greek crisis has set in motion severe strains within the EU economy, far worse than the press or the politicians are willing to admit. 

The French elites see only two possibilities: there will either be an orderly withdrawal of Germany from the euro, or an all-out sovereign debt crisis. It is clear that France is heading into the same eye of the storm as Greece. There is no solution to this nightmare for nobody is willing to even contemplate that they are possibly wrong.

We are heading into a Sovereign Debt Crisis of great magnitude. We will need Socrates desperately, for at this point, there is no one left with an opinion that will matter when we have not faced such a situation since the 18th century.

Most Scientific Research of Western Medicine Untrustable, Say Insiders and Experts

The fraudulent scientific research of Big Pharma is rife, and has been acknowledged as untrustable by medical journal editors, professors, doctors, government officials and former Big Pharma insiders.

Fraudulent scientific research

is rife throughout the world due to the power of monetary influence wielded by Big Pharma, the giant cartel of multinational pharmaceutical corporations started over 100 years ago by the Rockefellers. This fraudulent scientific research is now so widespread and pervasive it is become an open secret. There is a long list of medical journal editors, doctors and professors on the “outside”, former Big Pharma employees and executives on the “inside”, as well as government officials somewhere in between, who have stepped forward as whistleblowers and acknowledged the fraud. Money buys favorable research. Period. This is not really surprising, given the history of Rockefeller Western medicine and the fact that Big Pharma’s business model is based on “managing” disease, “treating” symptoms and keeping patients on the hamster wheel, rather than actually healing them completely.

Everyone Knows How the “Game” Works

Whistleblower Dr. Peter Rost, former vice president of Pfizer, a giant Big Pharma company, spelled it out. In the video clip embedded above, taken from the documentary One More Girl, he reveals that everyone knows how the “game” works:
“Universities, health organizations, everybody that I have encountered … are out there …. begging for money. (Big Pharma corporations) use that money to basically buy influence … (Big Pharma provides) grants for various kinds of research … make sure they (scientific researchers) became beholden … Everyone obviously knows this is how things work.”
“They (scientific researchers) are not going to continue to get money unless they’re saying what you (i.e. Big Pharma) want them to say. They know it, you know it, and it’s only maybe the public that doesn’t know it.”
In this way, the almost the entire medical scientific community has been compromised and has become thoroughly untrustworthy.

Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by Medical Journal Editors and Professors

Look at what numerous key experts are saying about this epidemic of fraudulent scientific research. Dr. Richard Horton is the current editor-in-chief of the British Lancet journal, which is respected as one of the best peer-reviewed medical journals in the world. He came out and stated:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”
Then look at what Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), had to say about the pervasive fraudulent scientific research:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines … I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”
Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, a professor of disease prevention at Stanford University, published a study in a PLoS One paper entitled Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. He found that research conclusions are less likely to be true when study samples sizes are too small, when effect sizes are even smaller, and when there are major variances in study designs, definitions, outcomes and analytical modes. He highlighted the corrupting influence of Big Pharma and concluded that:
“There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false … it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true.”

Aug 5, 2015

A couple professors decided to answer the question: Does your government represent We the People? Using 20 years worth of data they found that the opinions of 90% of Americans have essentially no impact at all on the completely corrupted Congress.

Original Here
Have you ever felt like the government doesn’t really care what you think?
Professors Martin Gilens (Princeton University) and Benjamin I. Page (Northwestern University) looked at more than 20 years worth of data to answer a simple question: Does the government represent the people?

Their study took data from nearly 2000 public opinion surveys and compared it to the policies that ended up becoming law. In other words, they compared what the public wanted to what the government actually did. What they found was extremely unsettling: The opinions of 90% of Americans have essentially no impact at all.

This video gives a quick rundown of their findings — it all boils down to one simple graph:
Note: All sources linked at the bottom of this page

Princeton University study: Public opinion has “near-zero” impact on U.S. law.
Gilens & Page found that the number of Americans for or against any idea has no impact on the likelihood that Congress will make it law.
“The preferences of the average American appear to have only a miniscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.”
One thing that does have an influence? Money. While the opinions of the bottom 90% of income earners in America have a “statistically non-significant impact,” Economic elites, business interests, and people who can afford lobbyists still carry major influence.
Nearly every issue we face as a nation is caught in the grip of corruption.

From taxation to national debt, education to the economy, America is struggling to address our most serious issues. Moneyed interests get what they want, and the rest of us pay the price.
They spend billions influencing America’s government. We give them trillions in return.
As the cost of winning elections explodes, politicians of both political parties become ever more dependent on the tiny slice of the population who can bankroll their campaigns.
To win a Senate seat in 2014, candidates had to raise $14,351 every single day. Just .05% of Americans donate more than $10,000 in any election, so it’s perfectly clear who candidates will turn to first, and who they’re indebted to when they win.
In return for campaign donations, elected officials pass laws that are good for their mega-donors, and bad for the rest of us.

Our elected officials spend 30-70% of their time in office fundraising for the next election. When they’re not fundraising, they have no choice but to make sure the laws they pass keep their major donors happy — or they won’t be able to run in the next election.

Jul 27, 2015

The Curse Of The Euro: Money Corrupted, Democracy Busted

The preposterous Gong Show in Brussels over the weekend was the financial “Ben Tre” moment for the Euro and ECB. That is, it was the moment when the Germans—–imitating the American military on that ghastly morning in February 1968——set fire to the Eurozone in order to save it.
Some day history will judge good riddance……..but that get’s ahead of the story.
According to an American soldier’s first hand recollection of the Vietnam event, it was a Major Booris who infamously told reporter Peter Arnett, “It became necessary to destroy the town to save it”. 

After the massacre of Greek democracy in the wee hours Monday morning, Angela Merkel said the same thing—even if her language was a tad less graphic:
It reflects the basic principles which we’ve followed in rescuing the euro. It now hinges on step-by-step implementation of what we agreed tonight.”
Now no one in their right mind could think that lending another $96 billion to an utterly bankrupt country makes any sense whatsoever. After all, the Greek economy has shrunk by 30% since 2008 and is wreathing under what is objectively a $400 billion public debt already in place today.
That figure follows from the fact that on top of Greece’s acknowledged $360 billion of general government debt there’s at least another $25 billion loan embedded in the ELA advances to the Greek banking system. The latter is deeply insolvent, meaning that some considerable portion of the $100 billion ELA currently outstanding is not an advance against good collateral in any plausible banking sense of the word, but merely a backdoor fiscal transfer from the ECB to keep Greece’s financial shipwreck afloat.

Likewise, as I demonstrated Friday, given the even deeper deep hole into which the Greek economy has tumbled during the last six months, the fiscal targets extracted from Greece under this weekend’s demarche are utterly ridiculous. Indeed, even if the targeted primary surpluses of 1,2,3 and 3.5% of GDP are miraculously reached through 2018, upwards of $15 billion of budget deficits after interest accruals would be incurred anyway, and a lot more than that if there are material budget shortfalls, which is a virtual certainty.

So even before the latest dose of Troika economic punishment further debilitates its economy, Greece at this very moment has a de facto public debt of $400 billion sitting atop $200 billion of GDP.
Here’s the bottom line. Merkel has no better answer for how dropping $96 billion of new debt on a country with a 200% public debt ratio will save the euro than did Major Booris when he dropped approximately 10,000 gallons of napalm on Ben Tre in order to “save” the town. In both cases, a doomsday machine had been set in motion, and the designated officers of the state mechanically and blindly carried out a mindlessly destructive next step.

In the instant case, the doomsday machine is the Euro and, more precisely the rogue central bank in Frankfurt that stands behind it. In fact, the real ill is not a common currency per se—-something that Europe actually had on a de facto basis before 1914 under the fixed exchange rates of the gold standard. The latter, in effect, was a common currency because French francs, British sterling, Dutch guilders and the rest were interchangeable at a constant rate—-an arrangement which helped produce a multi-decade spurt of prosperity that the old continent has not seen before or since.

No, the problem is the rampaging printing press of the ECB. The latter has fundamentally falsified the price of debt, and thereby unleashed throughout Europe a deadly brew of phony economic growth in the early years and then egregious fiscal profligacy when the growth bubble cratered after the 2008 crisis.
During its initial eight years, the ECB expanded its balance sheet at a torrid 14% annual rate. And that’s ironic because the original remit of the ECB was a Friedmanesque “price stability” single mandate.
Historical Data Chart
That didn’t happen, of course, as the European consumer price level rose by 21% during the same eight years (2.4% per annum) in which the ECB’s printing press was running red hot. Uncle Milton would have been rolling in his grave, and, in fact, beforehand had pronounced the euro a disaster waiting to happen.