John Williams: A Hyper-Inflationary Great Depression is Coming
Spain Is in Pain—USD and Gold Are Safe Havens
Get Prepared for Massive Launch
Neil Charnock, GoldOz - Gold is breaking out in all currencies and I forecasted a rise to the US$1,180 area a week or so back. .only a few weeks left before we see lift off. (4/29/10)
The Ultimate Currency Hedge
Adrian Ash, BullionVault - Nothing works like gold when you need to hedge against your own currency. . . (4/29/10)
Aden Forecast - "A renewed rise is clearly underway and gold is poised to rise further." (4/29/10)
Gold's Best Is Yet to Come
Dow Theory Letters - "Stay with your gold. . .positions. The frenzy lies somewhere ahead." (4/29/10)
Dubai's Biggest Gold Dealer Sees 20% Sales Surge
World Gold Council - ". . .increase could be attributed to steady rises in demand for bullion from jewelers and banks." (4/29/10)
May 2, 2010
|Extremely interesting from the latest John Maulding Newsletter (excerpts): |
The Future of Public DebtFor the rest of this letter, and probably next week as well, we are going to look at a paper from the Bank of International Settlements, often thought of as the central bankers' central bank. This paper was written by Stephen G. Cecchetti, M. S. Mohanty, and Fabrizio Zampolli. ( http://www.bis.org/publ/work300.pdf?noframes=1)
The paper looks at fiscal policy in a number of countries and, when combined with the implications of age-related spending (public pensions and health care), determines where levels of debt in terms of GDP are going. The authors don't mince words. They write at the beginning:
"Our projections of public debt ratios lead us to conclude that the path pursued by fiscal authorities in a number of industrial countries is unsustainable. Drastic measures are necessary to check the rapid growth of current and future liabilities of governments and reduce their adverse consequences for long-term growth and monetary stability."
Drastic measures is not language you typically see in an economic paper from the BIS. But the picture they paint for the 12 countries they cover is one for which drastic measures is well-warranted. I am going to quote extensively from the paper, as I want their words to speak for themselves, and I'll add some color and explanation as needed. Also, all emphasis is mine.
"The politics of public debt vary by country. In some, seared by unpleasant experience, there is a culture of frugality. In others, however, profligate official spending is commonplace. In recent years, consolidation has been successful on a number of occasions. But fiscal restraint tends to deliver stable debt; rarely does it produce substantial reductions. And, most critically, swings from deficits to surpluses have tended to come along with either falling nominal interest rates, rising real growth, or both. Today, interest rates are exceptionally low and the growth outlook for advanced economies is modest at best. This leads us to conclude that the question is when markets will start putting pressure on governments, not if.
"When, in the absence of fiscal actions, will investors start demanding a much higher compensation for the risk of holding the increasingly large amounts of public debt that authorities are going to issue to finance their extravagant ways? In some countries, unstable debt dynamics, in which higher debt levels lead to higher interest rates, which then lead to even higher debt levels, are already clearly on the horizon.
"It follows that the fiscal problems currently faced by industrial countries need to be tackled relatively soon and resolutely. Failure to do so will raise the chance of an unexpected and abrupt rise in government bond yields at medium and long maturities, which would put the nascent economic recovery at risk. It will also complicate the task of central banks in controlling inflation in the immediate future and might ultimately threaten the credibility of present monetary policy arrangements.
"While fiscal problems need to be tackled soon, how to do that without seriously jeopardising the incipient economic recovery is the current key challenge for fiscal authorities."
They start by dealing with the growth in fiscal (government) deficits and the growth in debt. The US has exploded from a fiscal deficit of 2.8% to 10.4% today, with only a small 1.3% reduction for 2011 projected. Debt will explode (the correct word!) from 62% of GDP to an estimated 100% of GDP by the end of 2011. Remember that Rogoff and Reinhart show that when the ratio of debt to GDP rises above 90%, there seems to be a reduction of about 1% in GDP. The authors of this paper, and others, suggest that this might come from the cost of the public debt crowding out productive private investment.
Think about that for a moment. We are on an almost certain path to a debt level of 100% of GDP in less than two years. If trend growth has been a yearly rise of 3.5% in GDP, then we are reducing that growth to 2.5% at best. And 2.5% trend GDP growth will NOT get us back to full employment. We are locking in high unemployment for a very long time, and just when some one million people will soon be falling off the extended unemployment compensation rolls.
Government transfer payments of some type now make up more than 20% of all household income. That is set up to fall rather significantly over the year ahead unless unemployment payments are extended beyond the current 99 weeks. There seems to be little desire in Congress for such a measure. That will be a significant headwind to consumer spending.
Government debt-to-GDP for Britain will double from 47% in 2007 to 94% in 2011 and rise 10% a year unless serious fiscal measures are taken. Greece's level will swell from 104% to 130%, so the US and Britain are working hard to catch up to Greece, a dubious race indeed. Spain is set to rise from 42% to 74% and "only" 5% a year thereafter; but their economy is in recession, so GDP is shrinking and unemployment is 20%. Portugal? 71% to 97% in the next two years, and there is almost no way Portugal can grow its way out of its problems.
Japan will end 2011 with a debt ratio of 204% and growing by 9% a year. They are taking almost all the savings of the country into government bonds, crowding out productive private capital. Reinhart and Rogoff, with whom you should by now be familiar, note that three years after a typical banking crisis the absolute level of public debt is 86% higher, but in many cases of severe crisis the debt could grow by as much as 300%. Ireland has more than tripled its debt in just five years.
The BIS continues:
"We doubt that the current crisis will be typical in its impact on deficits and debt. The reason is that, in many countries, employment and growth are unlikely to return to their pre-crisis levels in the foreseeable future. As a result, unemployment and other benefits will need to be paid for several years, and high levels of public investment might also have to be maintained.
"The permanent loss of potential output caused by the crisis also means that government revenues may have to be permanently lower in many countries. Between 2007 and 2009, the ratio of government revenue to GDP fell by 2-4 percentage points in Ireland, Spain, the United States and the United Kingdom. It is difficult to know how much of this will be reversed as the recovery progresses. Experience tells us that the longer households and firms are unemployed and underemployed, as well as the longer they are cut off from credit markets, the bigger the shadow economy becomes."
We are going to skip a few sections and jump to the heart of their debt projections. Again, I am going to quote extensively, and my comments will be in brackets .Note that these graphs are in color and are easier to read in color (but not too difficult if you are printing it out). Also, I usually summarize, but this is important. I want you to get the full impact. Then I will make some closing observations.
The Future Public Debt Trajectory"We now turn to a set of 30-year projections for the path of the debt/GDP ratio in a dozen major industrial economies (Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States). We choose a 30-year horizon with a view to capturing the large unfunded liabilities stemming from future age-related expenditure without making overly strong assumptions about the future path of fiscal policy (which is unlikely to be constant). In our baseline case, we assume that government total revenue and non-age-related primary spending remain a constant percentage of GDP at the 2011 level as projected by the OECD. Using the CBO and European Commission projections for age-related spending, we then proceed to generate a path for total primary government spending and the primary balance over the next 30 years. Throughout the projection period, the real interest rate that determines the cost of funding is assumed to remain constant at its 1998-2007 average, and potential real GDP growth is set to the OECD-estimated post-crisis rate.
[That makes these estimates quite conservative, as growth-rate estimates by the OECD are well on the optimistic side.]
Debt Projections"From this exercise, we are able to come to a number of conclusions. First, in our baseline scenario, conventionally computed deficits will rise precipitously. Unless the stance of fiscal policy changes, or age-related spending is cut, by 2020 the primary deficit/GDP ratio will rise to 13% in Ireland; 8-10% in Japan, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States; [Wow!] and 3-7% in Austria, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands and Portugal. Only in Italy do these policy settings keep the primary deficits relatively well contained - a consequence of the fact that the country entered the crisis with a nearly balanced budget and did not implement any real stimulus over the past several years.
"But the main point of this exercise is the impact that this will have on debt. The results plotted as the red line in Graph 4 [below] show that, in the baseline scenario, debt/GDP ratios rise rapidly in the next decade, exceeding 300% of GDP in Japan; 200% in the United Kingdom; and 150% in Belgium, France, Ireland, Greece, Italy and the United States. And, as is clear from the slope of the line, without a change in policy, the path is unstable. This is confirmed by the projected interest rate paths, again in our baseline scenario. Graph 5 [below] shows the fraction absorbed by interest payments in each of these countries. From around 5% today, these numbers rise to over 10% in all cases, and as high as 27% in the United Kingdom.
"Seeing that the status quo is untenable, countries are embarking on fiscal consolidation plans. In the United States, the aim is to bring the total federal budget deficit down from 11% to 4% of GDP by 2015. In the United Kingdom, the consolidation plan envisages reducing budget deficits by 1.3 percentage points of GDP each year from 2010 to 2013 (see eg OECD (2009a)).
"To examine the long-run implications of a gradual fiscal adjustment similar to the ones being proposed, we project the debt ratio assuming that the primary balance improves by 1 percentage point of GDP in each year for five years starting in 2012. The results are presented as the green line in Graph 4. Although such an adjustment path would slow the rate of debt accumulation compared with our baseline scenario, it would leave several major industrial economies with substantial debt ratios in the next decade.
"This suggests that consolidations along the lines currently being discussed will not be sufficient to ensure that debt levels remain within reasonable bounds over the next several decades.
"An alternative to traditional spending cuts and revenue increases is to change the promises that are as yet unmet. Here, that means embarking on the politically treacherous task of cutting future age-related liabilities. With this possibility in mind, we construct a third scenario that combines gradual fiscal improvement with a freezing of age-related spending-to-GDP at the projected level for 2011. The blue line in Graph 4 shows the consequences of this draconian policy. Given its severity, the result is no surprise: what was a rising debt/GDP ratio reverses course and starts heading down in Austria, Germany and the Netherlands. In several others, the policy yields a significant slowdown in debt accumulation. Interestingly, in France, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States, even this policy is not sufficient to bring rising debt under control.
[And yet, many countries, including the US, will have to contemplate something along these lines. We simply cannot fund entitlement growth at expected levels. Note that in the US, even by "draconian" estimates, debt-to-GDP still grows to 200% in 30 years. That shows you just how out of whack our entitlement programs are.
Sidebar: This also means that if we - the US - decide as a matter of national policy that we do indeed want these entitlements, it will most likely mean a substantial VAT tax, as we will need vast sums to cover the costs, but with that will come slower growth.]
[Long before interest rates rise even to 10% of GDP in the early 2020s, the bond market will have rebeled. This is a chart of things that cannot be. Therefore we should be asking ourselves what is the End Game if the fiscal deficits are not brought under control.]
"All of this leads us to ask: what level of primary balance would be required to bring the debt/GDP ratio in each country back to its pre-crisis, 2007 level? Granted that countries which started with low levels of debt may never need to come back to this point, the question is an interesting one nevertheless. Table 3 presents the average primary surplus target required to bring debt ratios down to their 2007 levels over horizons of 5, 10 and 20 years. An aggressive adjustment path to achieve this objective within five years would mean generating an average annual primary surplus of 8-12% of GDP in the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom and Ireland, and 5-7% in a number of other countries. A preference for smoothing the adjustment over a longer horizon (say, 20 years) reduces the annual surplus target at the cost of leaving governments exposed to high debt ratios in the short to medium term.
[Can you imagine the US being able to run a budget surplus of even 2.4% of GDP? $350 billion-plus a year? That would be a swing in the budget of almost 10% of GDP.]
That is enough for today. We will delve further next week.
John Mauldin John@FrontLineThoughts.com
Copyright 2010 John Mauldin. All Rights Reserved
Note: The generic Accredited Investor E-letters are not an offering for any investment. It represents only the opinions of John Mauldin and Millennium Wave Investments. It is intended solely for accredited investors who have registered with Millennium Wave Investments and Altegris Investments at www.accreditedinvestor.ws or directly related websites and have been so registered for no less than 30 days. The Accredited Investor E-Letter is provided on a confidential basis, and subscribers to the Accredited Investor E-Letter are not to send this letter to anyone other than their professional investment counselors. Investors should discuss any investment with their personal investment counsel. John Mauldin is the President of Millennium Wave Advisors, LLC (MWA), which is an investment advisory firm registered with multiple states. John Mauldin is a registered representative of Millennium Wave Securities, LLC, (MWS), an FINRA registered broker-dealer. MWS is also a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) registered with the CFTC, as well as an Introducing Broker (IB). Millennium Wave Investments is a dba of MWA LLC and MWS LLC. Millennium Wave Investments cooperates in the consulting on and marketing of private investment offerings with other independent firms such as Altegris Investments; Absolute Return Partners, LLP; Fynn Capital; Nicola Wealth Management; and Plexus Asset Management. Funds recommended by Mauldin may pay a portion of their fees to these independent firms, who will share 1/3 of those fees with MWS and thus with Mauldin. Any views expressed herein are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest with any CTA, fund, or program mentioned here or elsewhere. Before seeking any advisor's services or making an investment in a fund, investors must read and examine thoroughly the respective disclosure document or offering memorandum. Since these firms and Mauldin receive fees from the funds they recommend/market, they only recommend/market products with which they have been able to negotiate fee arrangements.
|Send to a Friend | Print Article | View as PDF | Permissions/Reprints|
You have permission to publish this article electronically or in print as long as the following is included:
John Mauldin, Best-Selling author and recognized financial expert, is also editor of the free Thoughts From the Frontline that goes to over 1 million readers each week. For more information on John or his FREE weekly economic letter go to: http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/learnmore
To subscribe to John Mauldin's E-Letter please click here: http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/subscribe.asp
Most Popular Posts of the Week:
- London Beheading Hoax Confirmed?
- Michel Chossudovsky: The Anti-Globalization Movement and the World
- Black Eagle Fund, the Shadow CIA and the relationship to Sept. 11th
- The Prison System Expands at Frightening Pace Following Declaration of War on Drugs
- Dear Citizen: We Want it All
- THE COLLAPSE OF FIAT MONEY BY A FALLING ENERGY SUPPLY
- UKIP's Godfrey Bloom Blasts Fractional Reserve Lending as Fraud; Says Central Bankers Should be Tried for Financial Crimes
- Hilarious! Top official to plead Fifth Amendment protections after targeting constitutional groups that taught the Bill of Rights
- Folly of Preserving the Euro at All Costs; Should France Lead Breakup of Euro?
- THE SATURDAY ESSAY:What else are they manipulating?
"backyard" "bank holiday" "Change" "Jewish Achievements" 1st Amendment 2nd amendment 4GW 4th Reich 7/7 9/11 abiotic oil abuses of power ACTA Afghanistan AfPak Africa AFRICOM agenda 21 al-CIAduh alternative currencies American revolution anarchy apocalypse Argentina ARTICHOKE Asia Asian Energy Security Grid assassinations asteroids austerity AWOL ballistic missiles B/S backfire bad cops bailout bailout scam bank nazionalization banksters big oil big pharma Bilderberg Bin Laden biofuels biological warfare biological weapons biological weapons research bioterrorism bird flu bitcoins black ops Blackwater Brazil BRICs Brzezinski bubbles cap and trade capitalism carbon credits carbon tax carbon trade cash nexus cass sunstein casus belli CDS Central Asia central banks CFR Cheney China CIA CIA assets civil wars class conflicts class structure class warfare climategate COINTELPRO collapse Color revolutions COMEX default communism community currencies Congo conspiracies conspiracy theories Constitution Copyright corporate "personhood" corporate law corporatocracy corruption countercoup counterinsurgency Coup D'etat covert agents covert operations covert ops covert war covert warfare coverup crazy lone gunmen crimes against humanity currencies currency war dancing israelis David Kelly dead microbiologists death squads debt debt bondage debt bubble debt monetization debtors' prisons deep politics default deficit deflation deglobalization deindustralization deja vu delocalization democracy depleted uranium depopulation depression deregulation derivatives detentions Detroit devaluation devolution dictatorship Dimitri Khalezov dirty tricks dirty wars disaster capitalism disaster management discovery disinformation dissent diy diy currencies DMCA drones drugs trade DU dystopias eastern europe ECB eco-fascism economic cycle economic hitmen economic warfare Egypt electromagnetic weapons electronic surveillance elite consensus elitist propaganda Ellen Brown emerging markets end game energy engineered clusterfuck Ethiopia EU EU666 eugenics euro eurocracy eurocrats europe fake bonds fake democracy fake gold fake revolutions fake terrorism false flags fascism fascism 2.0 FED FEMA FEMA death camps fiat money Finance Capitalism forecasts ForeclosureGate foreclosures FOREIGN TRADE ZONES Fort Detrick fractional reserve banking France fraudclosures fraudonomics frauds Free books free money free speech freedom Fukushima funny money G20 gatekeepers Gaza genocides geoengineering Geopolitics Germany Ghana ghost towns Gladio global currency Global warming hoax globalization GMO gold gold manipulation gold standard Goldman Sachs golpe google Grand Chessboard great depression 2.0 great game Greece Green shoots greenbackers Guantanamo Gulf of Tonkin gun ban gun control Guns H.R. 45 HAARP habeas corpus hackers Haiti Halliburton happiness health health care bill health care reform hemp heroin high frequency trading historical cycles history hitler hoaxes Honduras House Bill 1796 how-to human organs trafficking human rights Hungary hunger hyperinflation ICC Iceland Illuminati IMF imf riots immigration imperialism incoherence income distribution income tax India inequalities infiltration inflation inflationary depression information war insider trading insolvency instability insurgency intelligence International Criminal Court international political economy internet censorship internet warfare ior IP IPCC Iran Iraq Ireland IRS Israel israeli assets Israeli firsters Israeli killers israeli lobby Israeli Organ Harvesting israeli terrorism italy Ivory Coast jesuits jews JFK Jim Willie JPM k-waves Kazakhstan Keynesianism Kissinger kleptocracy Kosovo Krugman KUBARK Kurt Sonnenfeld Kyrgyzstan Land Grab Large Hadron Collider Larry Summers Latin America LBMA Lee Harvey Oswald legitimacy crisis legitimation lesser evilism Libya lies Limited Hang Out Lincoln Lisbon Treaty lobbying local currencies Lockerbie Logan Act lol looting lsd mafia Mali Manchurian candidates Mandatory vaccinations maquiladoras market manipulations martial law Martin Armstrong Medicare meltdown MENA Mend mercenaries Mexico MI5 Michael Chertoff Michael Hudson Middle East migrations Military Industrial Complex military research military spending military tribunals militias mind control mind tricks Minerva Research Initiative Minot missing nukes missile defense missing pathogens MKDELTA MKNAOMI MKSEARCH MKULTRA money money as debt money laundering money supply Mongolia monsanto Montenegro morgellons mossad msm Mumbai narco-states narcodollars narcotics national debt National Emergencies Act national emergency native Americans NATO NDAA neo-Malthusians neocolonialism neocons neofeudalism neuroscience NGOs Nigeria NLP Non-lethal Weapons Noriega North Korea Norway NSA NSPD-51 nuclear demolition nukes NWO odious debt Oil OKLAHOMA CITY bombing oligarchy OOTW Operation Ajax operation CONDOR Operation Fast and Furious operation Mockingbird Operation Northwoods operation paperclip Operation Strange Man opium Orwell outrages p2p currencies Pakistan Palestine Panama Panarin pandemics paper money Paraguay paranoia paranoia pimping patents Patriot Act patsies pauperization peak oil pearl harbor Pennsylvania pensions Pentagon persuasion Peru pervs philippines Phoenix program piigs pimping Pipelinestan piracy Pirates plagues planned disasters Plum Island plutocracy PMCs PNAC poison pills Poland police state political economy political fakeries polls ponzi schemes pork Posse Comitatus Act pot poverty poverty business power elite pr0n predictive programming prepping primitive accumulation prison industrial complex prison population private debt privatizations problem-solution prohibitionism Project Artichoke Project Bluebird Project Censored Project MK/NAOMI Project Mockingbird project monarch Prompt Corrective Action Law propaganda prostitution protests provocateurs psy-ops psycho-police psychotronic warfare Ptech public policies qe qe2 R2P rabbis crackdown real wages regime change regulations relative disadvantage religion renditions renewable energy reserve currency resistance revolution revolution (how to) revolutions riots robots Rockfeller Roman Empire Rothschilds Rumsfeld Rupert Murdoch Russia Rwanda s510 sabbateans Salvador Option samson option saudi arabia sayanim SCADs scams scandals scares schemes SCO SDR secrecy secret algorithms Secret services sedition self-employment self-reliance serial killers sex scandals sheeple shock capitalism SHTF silver sixties slavery slums social conflicts social currencies social movements social research Social Security social spending socialization of costs somalia Soros sound money South Africa South Caucasus South Korea Southern Poverty Law Center Sovereignty Sovereignty Resolutions spain special economic zones spin spyware stagflation state of exception state secrets state terrorism statistics stimulus stuxnet submarines subprime Sudan suicides superbugs superimperialism suppressed technologies supremacist racist genocidal apocalyptic cults surveillance Survivalism SVADs sweden Swine Flu syria Taliban Tamiflu TAPI taxes tea party technocracy Tennessee TEOTWAWKI terrorism Thailand The Fourth Turning the left The Mogambo Guru Thirdworldization TIPS tiranny torture totalitarism toxic assets toxic waste trade deficit trade war treason Treasuries Bubble Tri-Border Area Trickle down trolls tsa tunisia Turkey uganda UK Ukraine UN underclass upper class US $ US army US bonds seized US debt US elections US gulags US hunger US secessionists US Treasuries US666 useful idiots vaccines VAT vatican Venezuela vets vietghanistan Vietnam violent conflicts virii Voodoo war war crimes WAR CRIMINALS war on drugs war party war pimps war propaganda warfare warfare state wars water WB wealth distribution web bot weed Weimar weird welfare white collar criminals White phosphorous WHO who rules Wikileaks wikipedia witch hunt WMD working poors world bank world economy world hegemony world reserve currency world trade WTF WTO WW3 xe Xinjiang Yemen Yuan Yugoslavia Zimbabwe zionism zionist trolls zious
Protect Your ASSets: Buy Gold or Silver NOW - If you wait you will be late.
(He who panics first, just may salvage something.