A birth certificate fake as a 3$ bill from the alien manchurian son of the CIA

From SherrieQuestioningAll, APRIL 27, 2011

Here is the Problem with Obama's Birth Certificate..... Kenya was not so named until December 1963!!! It was British East Africa Protectorate - Also Hospital name Was not that name until 1978!!!!!!

The Obama Birth certificate has a slight problem, though MSM will never say so.  In fact they will now say "Let's put this to rest, he has proven he was born in Hawaii".

BUT there is 2 GLARING PROBLEMS with the Birth certificate.

Obama was born in August 1961.  His birth certificate has his father being born in Kenya - the birth certificate released today (April 27th 2011) is linked below.

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/A_Politics/longformbirthcertificate.pdf

The father is listed as Kenyan born.

Well.......

The name of the country BEFORE it was named Kenya in 1963 after Jomo Kenyatta was 

British East Africa Protectorate

The name Kenya did not come into play until 1963.... So how could it be in 1961 on a birth certificate a place of birth is listed as Kenya before it was even a country named Kenya???

I have not been an outright "birther"  but I DO LIKE TRUTH!  The birth certificate has that problem which I consider to be a huge problem!

Here is some information about Kenya and the history of it:

http://glpinc.org/Classroom%20Activities/Kenya%20Articles/Struggle%20for%20Independence.htm

Jomo Kenyatta was born in Gatundu; the year of his birth is uncertain, but most scholars agree he was born in the 1890s. He was born into the Kikuyu ethnic group. Named Kamau wa Ngengi at birth, he later adopted the surname Kenyatta (from the Kikuyu word for a type of beaded belt he wore) and then the first name Jomo. Kenyatta was educated by Presbyterian missionaries and by 1921 had moved to the city of Nairobi. There he became involved in early African protest movements, joining the Kikuyu Central Association (KCA) in 1924. In 1928 he became editor of the movement's newspaper. In 1929 and 1931 Kenyatta visited England to present KCA demands for the return of African land lost to European settlers and for increased political and economic opportunity for Africans in Kenya, which had become a colony within British East Africa in 1920.

Jomo Kenyatta is revered as the founding father of modern Kenya

Here a debunker that went through the Kenya BC that had come up a couple of years ago.  Makes the case perfectly for why the Hawaii birth certificate can't be real.  He says what Kenya was called and the fact he was using it against "birthers" at that time.... yet it can be used now:

Edit to note:  Kenya is listed as a country, in 1960 on a map, but it was a British Colony and the name Kenya alone was not used - a debunker of "birthers" proves that below.

http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/08/02/the-latest-birther-fantasy-obamas-fake-kenyan-birth-certificate/

This leads to the second problem with the purported birth certificate. From December 12, 1963 until December 12, 1964, the official title of Kenya was the Dominion of Kenya. It wasn’t until a year later, on December 12, 1964 that the Republic of Kenya came into existence. And yet, the document above, issued on February 17, 1964 purports to have been issued on behalf of the Office of Principal Registrar, Coast Province, Republic of Kenya.

So above a debunker of the fake Kenyan birth certificate has now debunked the latest birth certificate.


BUT the BIGGEST Mistake??????

Considering the name for the hospital listed on the birth certificate listed was not so named until 1978!!!

The name on the hospital of the birth certificate is listed as Kapiolani.  But the name of the hospital in 1961 was: 

Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapiolani_Medical_Center_for_Women_and_Children

Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital opened in 1909 named for Emma Kauikeolani Napoleon Mahelona(1862–1931), the wife of Albert Spencer Wilcox (1844–1919).^[1] In 1978, it merged with Kapiʻolani Maternity Home to become Kapiʻolani Medical Center for Women and Children.^[2][3][4]

So those who forged the birth certificate, well they made some huge mistakes!  But I am sure this will never be mentioned in the MSM and even other people running for President will most likely not mention it either!  To be labeled a "birther" seems to be a bad name!

But I don't mind being labeled that now - but I would prefer TRUTHER!


So the birth certificate released today can not be real!

Edit to add - Market Ticker has it laid out how it is a fake -
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=2527481

2 comments:

Moggy said...

Has any one looked closely at the b/c issued from the WH today? Signature of the Registrar is apparently... U K La Lee

April 27, 2011 2:57 PM

Sherrie Questioning All said...

Yeah, I got that - the instrument out of Hawaii. The joke is on us.

April 27, 2011 3:02 PM _

_________-


Related:

Guide to What is Wrong (So Far) with the Obama Long-Form Birth Certificate 11

Obama birth certificate is just as authentic as the money supply, the food supply and Obamacare

New AKA Obama BC fake - Prove it to yourself

Digital Artifacts Prove Obama Birth Certificate Altered

Obama’s Latest Long-Form Birth Certificate Is a Fake

New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery

Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate; So Fake It Had To Be Done On Purpose

Obama Was Likely Set-Up with a Fake Birth Certificate

Purported birth certificate signed by "U K L Lee" – proving forgery -- may play Obama's swan song

Obama Is Right, There Are More Important Issues Than His Birth Certificate - Such as his extensive intelligence community background and the sealing of Barry Soetoro’s records by executive order

Obama's Birth Certificate: Not the Issue

Fake Obama Birth Certificate A Provable Poorly Done Forgery

Need More Proof It's Fake? No Problem...Click Here!

Busted: White House Now Claims They Ordered Short-Form COLB From Hawaii Department Of Health In 2008 Yet COLB Is Date Stamped 2007

Wayne Madsen: Foreign Intelligence Agencies Say Obama Birth Certificate Is Fake

Obama the love child?

Obama Forced To Release ‘Alleged’ Birth Certificate

Obama’s Birth Address Is Middle Of Highway

Imaging Expert: Obama Birth Certificate Contains Anomaly

Obama Birth Certificate Number Proves Forgery?


Is Birther Circus A White House Political Ploy?

The Bernanko has spoketh: full steam ahead to Weimar. Gold at new record high

From TheBurningPlatform, 27th April 2011:

Seconds after the Fed Announcement that they will keep printing at hyper-speed, gold surged, the dollar fell to 1.47 versus the Euro and the USD fell below 74 versus the DXY basket of currencies. The race to the bottom continues.

______

Related:

Peter Schiff – Fed’s Actions Cause Massive Gold & Silver Buying

More Fed Lies: Statement

FOMC gives Precious Metals Bulls reasons for cheer

Jim Willie: Currency Dead End Paradoxes

FOMC DECISION: NO CHANGE IN RATES, NO CHANGE IN POLICY

And Gold Is Back To Record Highs

Financial Press Talking Heads Focus on Bernanke's QE2 Money Printing Speech

Fed Wants Even Higher Inflation

Gold at new record high

Gold And Silver Re-Start…Dollar Falls

Silver Surges Over $46.25/oz as Rumours of a Short Squeeze and Cornering Market Gain Credence; Speculators Smell Blood

Fed with Blinders Securely in Place: Inflation Transitory

Fed Wants Even Higher Inflation

SHOW THIS CHART TO BERNANKE AT THE PRESS CONFERENCE

Gold Rises as US Rates Set to Stay "Exceptionally Low"

QE3 or not QE3? That is the Question

AFRICOM vs. ChinAfrica

From AlJazeera, 26 Apr 2011  
by Pepe Escobar 

From energy wars to water wars, the 21st century will be determined by a fierce battle for the world's remaining natural resources. The chessboard is global. The stakes are tremendous. Most battles will be invisible. All will be crucial. In resource-rich Africa, a complex subplot of the New Great Game in Eurasia is already in effect. It's all about three major intertwined developments: 1) The coming of age of the African Union (AU) in the early 2000s. 2) China's investment offencive in Africa throughout the 2000s. 3) The onset of the Pentagon's African Command (Africom) in 2007.   Beijing clearly sees that the Anglo-French-American bombing of Libya – apart from its myriad geopolitical implications – has risked billions of dollars in Chinese investments, not to mention forcing the (smooth) evacuation of more than 35,000 Chinese working across the country. And crucially, depending on the outcome – as in renegotiated energy contracts by a pliable, pro-Western government – it may also seriously jeopardise Chinese oil imports (3 per cent of total Chinese imports in 2010).  No wonder the China Military, a People's Liberation Army (PLA) newspaper, as well as sectors in academia, are now openly arguing that China needs to drop Deng Xiaoping's "low-profile" policy and bet on a sprawling armed forces to defend its strategic interests worldwide (these assets already total over $1.2 trillion). Now compare it with a close examination of Africom's strategy, which reveals as the proverbial hidden agenda the energy angle and a determined push to isolate China from northern Africa. One report titled "China's New Security Strategy in Africa" actually betrays the Pentagon's fear of the PLA eventually sending troops to Africa to protect Chinese interests. It won't happen in Libya. It's not about to happen in Sudan. But further on down the road, all bets are off.   Meddle is our middle name The Pentagon has in fact been meddling in Africa's affairs for more than half a century. According to a 2010 US Congressional Research Service study, this happened no less than 46 times before the current Libya civil war. Among other exploits, the Pentagon invested in a botched large-scale invasion of Somalia and backed the infamous, genocide-related Rwanda regime. The Bill Clinton administration raised hell in Liberia, Gabon, Congo and Sierra Leone, bombed Sudan, and sent "advisers" to Ethiopia to back dodgy clients grabbing a piece of Somalia (by the way, Somalia has been at war for 20 years). The September 2002 National Security Strategy (NSS), conceived by the Bush administration, is explicit; Africa is a "strategic priority in fighting terrorism". Yet, the never-say-die "war on terror" is a sideshow in the Pentagon's vast militarisation agenda, which favours client regimes, setting up military bases, and training of mercenaries – "cooperative partnerships" in Pentagon newspeak. Africom has some sort of military "partnership" – bilateral agreements – with most of Africa's 53 countries, not to mention fuzzy multilateral schemes such as West African Standby Force and Africa Partnership Station. American warships have dropped by virtually every African nation except for those bordering the Mediterranean. The exceptions: Ivory Coast, Sudan, Eritrea and Libya. Ivory Coast is now in the bag. So is South Sudan. Libya may be next. The only ones left to be incorporated to Africom will be Eritrea and Zimbabwe. Africom's reputation has not been exactly sterling – as the Tunisian and Egyptian chapters of the great 2011 Arab Revolt caught it totally by surprise. These "partners", after all, were essential for surveillance of the southern Mediterranean and the Red Sea. Libya for its part presented juicy possibilities: an easily demonised dictator; a pliable post-Gaddafi puppet regime; a crucial military base for Africom; loads of excellent cheap oil; and the possibility of throwing China out of Libya. Under the Obama administration, Africom thus started its first African war. In the words of its commander, General Carter Ham, "we completed a complex, short-notice, operational mission in Libya and… transferred that mission to NATO." And that leads us to the next step. Africom will share all its African "assets" with NATO. Africom and NATO are in fact one – the Pentagon is a many-headed hydra after all. Beijing for its part sees right through it; the Mediterranean as a NATO lake (neocolonialism is back especially, via France and Britain); Africa militarised by Africom; and Chinese interests at high risk.   The lure of ChinAfrica One of the last crucial stages of globalisation - what we may call "ChinAfrica" – established itself almost in silence and invisibility, at least for Western eyes. In the past decade, Africa became China's new Far West. The epic tale of masses of Chinese workers and entrepreneurs discovering big empty virgin spaces, and wild mixed emotions from exoticism to rejection, racism to outright adventure, grips anyone's imagination. Individual Chinese have pierced the collective unconscious of Africa, they have made Africans dream – while China the great power proved it could conjure miracles far away from its shores. For Africa, this "opposites attract" syndrome was a great boost after the 1960s decolonisation – and the horrid mess that followed it. China repaved roads and railroads, built dams in Congo, Sudan and Ethiopia, equipped the whole of Africa with fibre optics, opened hospitals and orphanages, and – just before Tahrir Square – was about to aid Egypt to relaunch its civilian nuclear programme. The white man in Africa has been, most of the time, arrogant and condescending. The Chinese, humble, courageous, efficient and discreet.    China will soon become Africa's largest trading partner – ahead of France and the UK – and its top source of foreign investment. It's telling that the best the West could come up with to counteract this geopolitical earthquake was to go the militarised way. The external Chinese model of trade, aid and investment – not to mention the internal Chinese model of large-scale, state-led investments in infrastructure – made Africa forget about the West while boosting the strategic importance of Africa in the global economy. Why would an African government rely on the ideology-based "adjustments" of IMF and the World Bank when China attaches no political conditions and respects sovereignty – for Beijing, the most important principle of international law? On top of it, China carries no colonial historical baggage in Africa.   Essentially, large swathes of Africa have rejected the West's trademark shock therapy, and embraced China. Western elites, predictably, were not amused. Beijing now clearly sees that in the wider context of the New Great Game in Eurasia, the Pentagon has now positioned itself to conduct a remixed Cold War with China all across Africa – using every trick in the book from obscure "partnerships" to engineered chaos. The leadership in Beijing is silently observing the waters. For the moment, the Little Helmsman Deng's "crossing the river while feeling the stones" holds. The Pentagon better wise up. The best Beijing may offer is to help Africa to fulfil its destiny. In the eyes of Africans themselves, that certainly beats any Tomahawk.  Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times (www.atimes.com). His latest book is Obama Does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009). He may be reached at pepeasia@yahoo.com The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy. _______ Related: Libya: "The Price of Freedom" Highest Standard of Living in Africa

Lisbon Treaty: Governments to Accept EU Commission´s Decisions Per Automaticity, EU Arrest Warrant Violating Human Rights, EU-KGB

From EuroMed, Wed 27 Apr 2011

Summary: Europe can say that Europe has delivered its part of the agreement on global governance, says EU President Jose Barroso, who boasts of having achieved all his requirements in the EU’s competitiveness pact - and even managed to have leaders from outside of the euro-zone coming rushing to deliver the last remnant of their sovereignty to Brussels. Not only that: The Heads of State and Government have unanimously accepted that in the future, they will have to accept, without discussion, what Barroso and van Rompusy submit to them on economic policy - and presumably other policies. This is the “Führer Befiehl. Wir Folger” disaster once again! And the first decree the EU leaders will make is a financial transaction tax for EU and UN revenues. It will affect us all, banks sending us the bill. The EU´s economic governance deprives the countries of their right to make their own budgets. For acc. to the “European Semester” they will first have to submit their financial bills for EU Commission approval before they submit them to the national parliaments. Should a country be so presumptuous as to ignore Brussels’ decrees, it must pay a non-interest-bearing deposit of 0.2% of its GDP - and on repetition 0.5% of its GDP. If a country does not fall into line, that sum is confiscated as a fine by the EU. The European Central Bank considers this too slack.

Such monitoring, which has profound influence on the lives of hundreds of millions of people, would be nearly impossible to track by citizens, journalists or civil society, being supervised by experts and lawyers in the Commission and Council working behind closed doors. Sony Kapoor, Director of Re-Define, adviser to the German Finance Ministry, warned that the new rules are not addressing the roots of the crisis. EU finance ministers set the size of the European Stability regime to be in place from 2013 at 700 billion €.
The unprecedented shift in power to the EU bloc from the national parliaments have strongly curtailed the ability of countries to write their own laws and was welcomed by the EU’s economy chief Olli Rehn. Ministers supported a half dozen new far-reaching laws which the Commissioner said “will lead to a quantum leap in terms of economic surveillance in Europe.” This discussion has been buried in the back pages of financial newspapers! But in the heart of the EU, they are in no doubt that a profound transformation of the EU bloc is about to take place.

Denmark´s politicians have shown a shameful pandering to the EU by throwing themselves in the dust before Barroso / van Rompuy, although the Danes have rejected the euro. For me, this must be unconstitutional. Prime Minister Lökke Rasmussen has guaranteed the parties that the contents of the Pact: states keeping wages tied to productivity, reducing the public sector; limiting government borrowing and moving away from labor-based taxation towards consumption-based taxation, have no impact on Denmark Policy or the Danish “no to the euro” - which appears to be a giant lie. By joining the euro pact, Copenhagen will have access to the euro-zone summits, where much of the future of a more profoundly integrated euro zone will be decided. The prime minister is also keen on being seen as a model European pupil ahead of Denmark´s time as the EU’s six-month rotating presidency in the first half of 2012. One might be tempted to speak of treason for the second time for the Lisbon Treaty, which allows for this.

It is now apparent that the European Arrest Warrant, which requires more than 1,000 victims a month, means gross violation of human rights, which the EU hypocritically boasts about promoting and in the name of which the EU inflicts war on countries like Libya, even threatening both Syria, Bahrain and Yemen with similar treatments if they do not respect the human rights which the EU so seriously breaches. Now the EU is about to ensure that human rights are respected under EU interpretation, merging the Europol, CEPOL, Frontex, Eurojust and COSI into a super organization that insightful people think will be a new KGB, which also has the Eurogendfor Gendarmerie at its disposal. This is something that fits old Maoist José Barroso. “What is happening is a silent revolution in the form of stronger economic governance in small steps,” he said in June last year. “Member States have accepted - and I hope they understand it precisely - very important powers of EU institutions in monitoring, and a much tighter control over public finances.” The inspection involves a decree that bankrupt countries with a debt of over 60 percent of GDPare are now expected to improve this situation by five percent a year over a period of three years. So social chaos as well as EU Commission and the IMF administration of such countries are impending.

*

The following shows that van Rompuy and Barroso have had “our” puppet politicians accept an automaticity to accept all they demand. Politicians have thus abandoned the last remnants of national souvereignty - in the case of Denmark this seems unconstitutional. Barroso is rubbing his hands with pride.

José Barroso, EU Press Release 24 March 2011 We are in fact now doing what was a very important aim for all those who wanted a stronger Union to complete the monetary union with an economic union. Europe may say that Europe has delivered its part of the bargain on global governance.

Here is what that meansEUObserver 25 March 2011 – José Barroso - A two-day summit in Brussels saw fresh national budget cuts and restructuring announced by a series of member states who wished to “go beyond” that which has been agreed within the fresh euro-plus pact. They are: Spain, France, Belgium and Germany.”

EULib 16 March 2011 - José Barroso to the EU Parliament: Let me turn now to the Euro area meeting. I stressed the proposal of a Pact that was called a Pact for Competitiveness. I am pleased to report you that all these principles have been agreed by the Heads of State and Government.

These new commitments will thereafter be included in the National Reform and Stability Programmes and be subject to the regular surveillance framework, with a strong central role for the Commission in the monitoring of the implementation of the commitments. The European Parliament will play its full role in line with its competences. Social partners will be fully involved at the EU level through the Tripartite Social Summit.  Besides, the Pact is open to non-Euro-area Member States if they so wish and I hope that most of them will join the Pact as soon as the next European Council.

Head of States and Government of the Euro area have also agreed on a quasi automaticity of their decisions on the Commission’s recommendations in the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) as the conclusions say, and I quote: “In deciding on the steps in the SGP the Council is expected to, as a rule, follow the recommendations of the Commission or explain its position in writing.”

Moreover, they have agreed that “the introduction of a financial transaction tax should be explored and developed further at the Euro area, EU and international levels. The positions taken by the European Parliament were indeed very important for the final consensus that was reach ed at the Euro area summit.

Economic governance.
It will set up a system of surveillance and accountably, which includes sanctions. EUOBSERVER 16 March 2011 If countries are in the eurozone, this oversight is backed up by the imposition of stiff new sanctions. Scofflaw states will have to fork out cash amounting to 0.2 percent of GDP into a non-interest bearing deposit account. If a country does not correct its situation in line with the recommendations of the commission and Council, this cash will be snatched away as a fine. This process can be repeated up to a maximum of 0.5 percent of GDP. The president of the ECB, Jean-Claude Trichet, expressed his dissatisfaction, saying: “The improvement in governance that is presently envisaged is in our opinion insufficient.” These imbalances may cover such issues as trade deficits, ‘excessive’ wages, levels of private and public debt, housing bubbles, the ‘misallocation of resources’ and ‘unsustainable levels of consumption’.

But in theory, these imbalances could be anything. Transparency campaigners have already raised a red card over this element of the package, worried that such surveillance, with its recommendations and fines having such profound influence over hundreds of millions of people’s lives, will be almost impossible to track by citizens, journalists or civil society, as the monitors will be experts and lawyers in the commission and Council behind closed doors. Sony Kapoor, for one, the director of Re-Define, a Brussels-based economic-policy think-tank and an advisor to the German treasury, warned that whatever the new rules hope to achieve, they do not tackle the root causes of the crisis.

Denmark´shameful eagerness to submit to the New World Order
EUObserver 22 March 2011: Denmark is to sign up to a pillar of the ‘comprehensive solution’ to the EU’s debt crisis, the so-called euro-pact, despite not being a member of the eurozone.

Copenhagen is sufficiently eager to get on board, that the Danish prime minister, Lars Lokke Rasmussen, has signed guarantees assuring parties that some of the euro-pact’s key features regarding retirement age hikes and EU intervention in collective bargaining will not alter policies regarding these subjects in Denmark.  Included among the guarantees is an assurance that the euro-pact will have no impact on the country’s opt-out from the single currency. Despite Rasmussen’s guarantees, the pact requires that states keep wages tied to productivity; reduce public services; limit government borrowing; and move away from labour-based taxation towards consumption-based taxation.  By joining the euro-pact, Copenhagen will gain access to euro-zone-only summits where much of the future of a more deeply integrated eurozone will be decided. Some analysts fear that those on the outside are in effect consigning themselves to the slow lane in a twin-track European Union.The prime minister is also eager to be seen as a model European pupil ahead of Denmark’s tenure as the EU’s six-month rotating presidency in the first half of 2012.

Separately on Monday, EU finance ministers backed details of a permanent bail-out fund for the eurozone, putting the size of the European Stability Mechanism, to be in place from 2013, at €700 billion. The sum gives it an effective lending capacity of €500 billion. To achieve this level of lending, ministers backed a delivery of€80 billion in cash from eurozone statesThe rest of the sum will be delivered via loan guarantees.

The European Arrest WarrantEUObserver 15 March 2011: There are now an average of more than one thousand EAWs per month, the overwhelming majority of which relate to minor crimes,” Europe’s chief human rights defender Thomas Hammarberg said. He cited the imprisonment of innocent persons, disproportionate arrests, violations of procedural rights and the impossibility in some countries for an innocent person to appeal against a decision.Since the only condition for carrying out the extradition is that the suspect must be accused of a crime carrying a minimum prison sentence of 12 months, judges in the home country of the suspect have few means to verify how justified the charges are. “There is a need to strengthen the human rights safeguards in EAW procedures,” he stressed, especially since the system “affects thousands of persons every year.” 55.000 persons were extradited between 2004 and 2009.

The Fair Trials International: The group has long time documented EAW abuses. “We have seen the lives and futures of many ordinary people – teachers, firemen, chefs and students – blighted by the European Arrest Warrant, a system that infringes basic rights and fails to deliver a fair and efficient extradition system”. In the case of Gary Mann, a fireman who was extradited to serve a two-year prison sentence for alleged hooliganism in Portugal, British courts stated that the warrant was an “embarrassment” to the UK and Portugal, said “serious injustice” had occurred, and that his trial in Portugal breached his basic fair trial rights.

The Daily Express 2 April 2011 Senior Eurocrats are plotting to set up a new European Union counter-terrorism agency that could cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds. And critics warned last night the body could turn into a Europe-wide secret police force that would be “like the KGB”. The move is also likely to infuriate MI5 and MI6 chiefs as British spies could be forced to share intelligence with European agents. EU counter-terrorism director Olivier Luyckx called for a series of existing EU security agencies including Europol, and here as well as Eurojust, Cosi, Frontex and Cepol to be pulled together in one body with sweeping powers. UK Independence Party Euro MP Godfrey Bloom said: “My worry is that it would be less like America’s CIA and more like Russia’s KGB.”
CommentMoney and dictatorial power for the EU, thanks to the Lisbon Treaty, which the Europeans did not want - paid by us in the end. This result is an internal EU decision by van Rompuy, Barroso and the EU Parliament - while “our “corrupt politicians just accept a reduction of our souvereignty. Denmark´s 1046 year-old souvereignty is falling to the ground due to high treason, lies and brainwashing. There is now automaticy in “our” politicians accepting whatever Rompuy and Barroso demand in the economic field – and beyond? This is the “Führer Befiehl. Wir Folger” disaster once again!

I cannot express what has happened better than the EUOBSERVER 16 March 2011 - European finance ministers have finally given the green light to a radical new centralised EU oversight of national budgeting processes and, broader still, of all economic policies - both of countries that use the single currency and those that do not.
The unprecedented shift in powers to the bloc from member-state parliaments, heavily limiting “policy space”, or the ability of countries to write their own laws, was saluted by EU economics chief Olli Rehn.The ministers were endorsing a half dozen new far-reaching laws that the commissioner said “will lead to a quantum leap of economic surveillance in Europe.”This discussion has been buried in the back of the financial pages of newspapers! But those at the heart of the EU are under no illusion about the profound transformation the bloc is about to undergo.

EU Commission President,  José Barroso was one of the leaders of the underground Maoist MRPP (Reorganising Movement of the Proletariat Party, later PCTP/MRPP, Communist Party of the Portuguese Workers/Revolutionary Movement of the Portuguese Proletariat) - he showed clear left-wing and Maoist inclinations. Today he is still fighting for the New World Order´s world communism/fascism – and apparently needs another KGB.  The above KGB structure is supported by the “Eurogendfor”, a gendarmerie force meant to subdue rebellious elements of the populations in the EU and elsewhere.

“What is going on is a silent revolution - a silent revolution in terms of stronger economic governance by small steps,”commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said last June. “The member states have accepted - and I hope they understood it exactly – very important powers of the European institutions regarding surveillance, and a much stricter control of the public finances.”
The new rules focus on keeping in check two elements of national government spending: the first being annual government budgets and the second, under a more open-ended process but under just as tight a leash, all economic policies - and not just for one year, but over the longer term. For countries with debts over 60 percent of GDP, they will now be expected to diminish this situation by five percent a year over a period of three years.

The “European Semester” demands all EU budgets to be accepted by the EU Commission before being presented to the National Parliaments! This was the last bit of national souvereignty.