Latests:

Jul 11, 2012

Syria: Updated, Psyops and a bit more


Just a bunch of links and videos for today.
Much to do the next couple of days. Up too and including this weekend. Sigh....

Russia is proposing a sanctions free UN resolution for Syria
Which is not expected to meet western approval. Also, the west is expected to make their own proposal.

I am not sure who left the link to this article?
Manufactured Realities Very in depth and well worth reading.
"The final and central piece of this operation was a communications platform you all know very well and use every day.  The global, open, instantaneous communications network that Twitter has become would be the vehicle to control the operation and deliver propaganda to the media and the public.  Video, graphics, website design, and disinformation were all prepared months in advance, as were the tools to enlist the unwitting cooperation of the masses.  Once set in motion this elaborate plan to gain the support of people worldwide was intended to grow organically through appealing to and manipulating the genuine and humanitarian desires and instincts of the people, while using them as cover for their true intentions.  To this very moment, it has continued to do just that"

 Asia Times had a good piece: Covering Syria: The information war
 The narrative, as CNN puts it, is in essence this: "The vast majority of reports from the ground indicate that government forces are killing citizens in an attempt to wipe out civilians seeking [President Bashar] al-Assad's ouster" - the aim being precisely to elicit a heart-wrenching emotional response in Western audiences that trumps all other considerations and makes the call for Western/Gulf intervention to effect regime change. 

But it is a narrative based on distortion, manipulation, lies and videotape.

In the first months, the narrative was of unarmed protesters being shot by Syrian forces. This then evolved into one of armed insurgents reluctantly "being provoked into taking up arms", as US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton explained, to defend peaceful protesters.

It was also a narrative that from the outset, according to a recent report in Time magazine, that the US has facilitated by providing training, support and equipment to Syrian opposition "cyber-warriors". 

Covering Syria and Manufactured Realities go well together. As does the video below, brought to us by
Tozz . Speaking of manufacturing realities, another video, demonstrating the absurdity of the FSA scripted dramatics?  Made for prime time?  Fooling so many people, so much of the time.....
However we would like to label the FSA dramatics? Tozz has chosen "Silly theater by FSA"

Separa


One last video, from Gallier
"Quick summary: the guy proves beyond the shadow of a doubt, by comparaison of pieces that the "Syrian rebel" on the AP photo of a Canadian mainstream paper (Metro) uses a weapon that comes from Israel. The showed weapon is an AK74 a modern Kalashnikov, but it isn't a normal, factory delivered model. It is kitted with accessories coming from an Israely company named zahal. As he shows in the video, that company boasts with its high profile connections. It is clear that whoever gave that gun to this terrorist (let's name things by their real name) had good connection to Israel."

It is in French. But, you'll get the gist of it!



That's all folks

ECONOMIC REPORT CARD – FAIL

From The Burning Platform8th July 2012

We are now three and one half years into Barack Obama’s presidency. I thought a few pertinent charts would help us assess the success of his economic policies. Upon his election he demanded an $800 billion stimulus package in order to keep the unemployment rate from surpassing 8%. The $800 billion was to be spent over two years we were told and then government spending would be scaled back to pre-stimulus levels. There were 145 million Americans employed when Obama was elected. There are 9 million more working age Americans today than there were in 2008. There are now 142.4 million employed Americans. So, we’ve added 9 million potential workers and still have 2.6 less Americans employed. We have the same number of Americans employed as we did in early 2006, when there were 17 million less working age Americans.
The Obama stimulus plan was passed with everything he wanted. Democrats controlled the House and Senate and gave him exactly what he proposed. By October 2009, the unemployment rate was 10%. Obama’s stimulus package and economic policies have been so successful that he has been able to get the unemployment rate all the way down to 8.2% after three and one half years, even though he said his stimulus package would keep the unemployment rate under 8%. And all it took to get the unemployment rate down to 8.2% was for 8 MILLION Americans to leave the labor force. A critical thinking person who doesn’t swallow the crap peddled by the BLS and the rest of the government propaganda machine might question WHY 8 million Americans would leave the workforce when people desperately need income. If the labor participation rate had stayed constant, the current unemployment rate is 10.9%.
070612rbjune
The long-term chart below tells the true story. The BLS classifying millions as not in the labor force is a crock. The Obama apologists and sycophants peddle a false storyline about Baby Boomers retiring as the cause for this labor force decline. The fact is people over the age of 55 have the highest participation rate in history and it continues to rise. Of the 142.4 million employed Americans, only 114 million works more than 35 hours per week, with 28.4 million working part-time. That means that 20% of those employed are part time workers with no benefits. In 2008, prior to the ascendency of Obama, there were 125 million full-time workers and 20 million part-time workers. Obama has been able to increase the percentage of part-time workers from 14% to 20% in just over 3 years. Remember this fact when Obama touts the 3 million new jobs he’s created since 2010.
If you were wondering what the 8.5 million Americans who have left the labor force since 2008 were doing, look no further than the millions of bedrooms now functioning as classrooms for the University of Phoenix and the other on-line, for profit diploma mills that have proliferated with the doling out of hundreds of billions in cheap government student loans. These for profit diploma mills know how to game the system and get their money even if the students drop out after a few months. They educate 12% of students, receive 25% of federal student aid and account for nearly 50% of loan defaults. Sounds like a great business model.
Low interest Federal government loans have skyrocketed from $100 billion when Obama took office to $450 billion today. Total student loan debt has surpassed $1 trillion, with the average student graduating with $25,000 of debt and many more burdened with $100,000 or more of debt. Those part-time jobs making lattes at Starbucks aren’t cutting it. Default rates are already at a ten year high and are poised to skyrocket as more people graduate into a jobless job market. Not only is the American taxpayer on the hook for the $450 billion of direct Federal student loans, but the Federal government is guaranteeing another $450 billion. When the student loan bubble pops, the taxpayer financed bailout will be epic. And this is all being engineered by the Obama administration in order to artificially reduce the unemployment rate. Does this graph remind you of another bubble that resulted in a few problems for the American taxpayer?
After three and a half years, Obama’s policies have led to 11 million less full-time workers and 8 million more part-time workers – just like he drew it up on the board when he committed $800 billion of your tax dollars to saving our economy through classic Keynesianism. Obama declared the stimulus would be a two year jolt to get our economy back on track. Federal government spending was $2.7 trillion in 2006, $2.7 trillion in 2007 and $3.0 trillion in 2008, the last three years of Bush’s administration. If spending stayed on a standard trajectory, it would have been $3.1 trillion in 2009, $3.2 trillion in 2010, $3.3 trillion in 2011 and $3.4 trillion in 2012. With the end of the Iraq occupation in 2010, it should have dropped by $200 billion, resulting in total spending of $3.1 trillion in 2011 and $3.2 trillion in 2012.
Obama declared the stimulus would be short-term. Federal government spending should have risen to $3.5 trillion in 2009, $3.6 trillion in 2010 ($300 billion stimulus – $200 billion Iraq withdrawal), and then revert back to $3.3 trillion in 2011 and $3.4 trillion in 2012. Let’s see whether Obama was honest in his promises:
Federal Government Spending
2009 – $3.5 trillion
2010 – $3.5 trillion
2011 – $3.6 trillion
2012 – $3.8 trillion
After three and one half years of stimulus spending, Cash for Clunkers, Home Buyer Tax Credits, mortgage modification programs, Fannie, Freddie & FHA accumulating billions in bank losses, zero interest rates, QE1, QE2, Operation Twist, unlimited student loans, wars of choice in the Middle East, mark to fantasy accounting standards for Wall Street, and hundreds of billions in bonuses for criminal bankers, we are left with a $5.3 trillion (50% increase) higher national debt and a $300 billion (2.3% increase) higher real GDP. That’s not exactly a big bang for your Keynesian buck. The response you will get from the Obama apologists is, “Imagine how bad it would have been if we didn’t spend the money”. This is a classic liberal response when their solutions are a total failure. Krugman will declare that if we had only spent another $2 trillion all would be well.
As you can see, Obama and all the politicians in Washington DC are really good at spending your money on pork projects, paying off campaign contributors and compensating their corporate cronies. Do you see any reversion back to normalized spending? How can current spending be $300 billion higher than the two stimulus years if Obama was telling the truth in 2009? The Obamanistas declare we are still in an emergency and must borrow and spend to save the economy. The emergency never ends for politicians of both parties. This is how they have bastardized John Maynard Keynes’ theory. They love to implement spending when the economy is in the dumper, but they forget his admonition to pay down debt during the good times. It never happens. There will always be another emergency. Even 2nd grade level Sesame Street fans can see the Federal government spending and debt accumulation never reverses. It couldn’t be any more obvious, unless you are an intellectually dishonest Keynesian ideologue hack (aka Krugman).
This brings us to the crowning economic achievement of the Obama administration. His most successful program is unequivocally the SNAP food stamp program. When Obama assumed power in January 2009 there were 32 million Americans on food stamps and the annual cost of the program was $44 billion. Today there are 46 million Americans on food stamps and the annual cost is pacing at $75 billion. He has been able to get fully 15% of the U.S. population enrolled in this fantastic program and the Department of Agriculture is even running advertisements to convince more people to join.
And don’t worry about any restrictions. You can buy as much soda, ice cream, cheetos, and fudge brownies with your SNAP card as you choose. Of course, you are still free to purchase higher end fare.
A cynical less trusting soul than me might even conclude that Obama’s goal is to provide government entitlements to as many people as possible in order to win votes in the upcoming election. One might ask how he can tout an economic recovery and the millions of “new” jobs he has created since 2010, when 6 million people have been added to the food stamp rolls since his economic recovery officially began in 2010. I’m confused by the Obama distinction between success and utter failure.
Not far behind the food stamp program, the SSDI program has been another resounding Obama success. He has been able to enroll twice as many participants in this program as jobs created since the end of the recession. There are already 10 million people on SSDI costing the American taxpayer in excess of $150 billion per year. There are 250,000 people per month applying for benefits and the program will be broke by 2015. In a shocking development, when people began to roll off the 99 week unemployment gravy train, the number of new SSDI applications soared. I guess they were depressed at not being able to collect unemployment for two more years.
Bob Adelman recently summed up the SSDI scam:
“The program, funded federally but administered by the states, is being milked by many who have run out of unemployment benefits and other resources and haven’t been able to find work. At present one out of every eight working-age, non-retired individuals receive disability payments, some for “mental disorders” and “back pain.” Claims for mental disorders, for instance, have more than tripled from 10 percent of cases in 1982 to 32.8 percent in 2012, with half of those based on “mood disorders” such as depression or anxiety. Back or neck “problems” have increased by 31 percent and were the top cause of disability for 50- to 64-year olds. Depression and anxiety and other emotional problems increased by 20 percent, and now constitute one-third of all disability claims. Once on the rolls, beneficiaries have little incentive to return to work because their disability entitles them to additional benefits such as food stamps, Medicaid, Section 8 housing, and student-loan forgiveness. As a result less than one half of one percent of those on disability ever go back to work.”
I’m depressed by the results of Obama’s economic policies. Maybe I should apply for SSDI.
It appears that former college professor Obama never paid attention in his macroeconomics undergraduate course. The “guns versus butter model” doesn’t enter the equation for a profound thinker like Barack. Why do hard choices need to be made when Ben Bernanke is manning the printing press? In the real world, a nation has to choose between two options when spending its finite resources. It can buy either guns (invest in defense/military) or butter (invest in production of goods), or a combination of both. This can be seen as an analogy for choices between defense and civilian spending in more complex economies. Politicians and bankers have been ignoring this rational model since 1971 when Nixon closed the gold window. Why make difficult choices when you can borrow and print your way to prosperity? As a country we’ve chosen guns, butter, BMWs, McMansions, free unfunded healthcare, unfunded pensions, unfunded sickcare, and DHS implemented security for all. In order to prove himself tougher than George W., Obama, the socialist, has actually increased war spending by 23% to an all-time high. Fiat currency is an amazing invention. Guns, butter and healthcare for all.
Mainstream media liberals like Ezra Klein dutifully trot out charts and storylines trying to convince the ignorant masses that Obama is not to blame for the soaring national debt. They declare it was the Bush tax cuts and his wars. This blame Bush storyline is growing old as Obama has already extended the Bush tax cuts once, ramped up wars in the Middle East and cut payroll taxes for the last two years. The Office of Management and Budget has calculated the total increase in the national debt will be $7.8 trillion after eight years of Obama, 269% more than was accumulated during the Bush reign of error. I believe the $7.8 trillion is ridiculously optimistic. The national debt has increased by $5.3 trillion since Obama took office. It will go up another $200 billion by the end of this fiscal year. It will surely exceed $1 trillion per year during a 2nd Obama term as he would extend most of the Bush tax cuts, extend the payroll tax cuts, continue to increase war spending, and the hidden delayed Obamacare costs would arrive. His eight year report card will show a $9.5 trillion increase in the national debt, reaching the magic grand total of $20 trillion. The national debt to GDP ratio will be close to 120%.
This scathing assessment of Obama’s economic policies is by no means an endorsement of Mitt Romney or his economic plan, since he has never provided a detailed economic plan. After four years of a Romney presidency, the national debt will also be $20 trillion as his war with Iran and handouts to his Wall Street brethren replace Obama’s food stamps and entitlement pork. There was only one presidential candidate whose proposals would have placed this country back on a sustainable path. The plutocracy controlled corporate mainstream media did their part in ignoring and then scorning Ron Paul during his truth telling campaign. The plutocracy wants to retain their wealth and power, while the willfully ignorant masses don’t want to think. The words of Ron Paul sum up what will occur over the coming years as the interchangeable pieces of this corporate fascist farce drive the country to ruin:
“Deficits mean future tax increases, pure and simple. Deficit spending should be viewed as a tax on future generations, and politicians who create deficits should be exposed as tax hikers.” 
“A system of capitalism presumes sound money, not fiat money manipulated by a central bank. Capitalism cherishes voluntary contracts and interest rates that are determined by savings, not credit creation by a central bank.”
“Believe me, the next step is a currency crisis because there will be a rejection of the dollar, the rejection of the dollar is a big, big event, and then your personal liberties are going to be severely threatened.”

The politicians, bankers and corporate titans running this country are too corrupt and cowardly to reverse the course on our path to destruction. The debt will continue to accumulate until our Minsky Moment. At that point the U.S. dollar will be rejected and chaos will reign. The Great American Empire will be no more. At that time sides will need to be chosen and blood will begin to spill. Decades of bad decisions, corruption, cowardice, ignorance, greed and sloth will come to a head. The verdict of history will not be kind to the once great American Empire.
______


Related:

19 Warnings About A Coming Global Financial Catastrophe


China Imports More Gold From Hong Kong In Five Months Than All Of UK’s Combined Gold Holdings

What’s Iran doing with Turkish gold? Accepting payment for oil

Zambia govt "happy" with sharp kwacha gains

LUSAKA (Reuters) - Zambia's government is happy with the near-10 percent appreciation of the kwacha against the dollar this month, and does not believe it will strengthen to the point that exporters suffer, deputy finance minister Miles Sampa said on Wednesday.

Gordon "Bottom" Brown Sold Britain’s Gold at Artificially Low Prices to Bail Out a Large American Bank

From Ritholtz,
By Washingtons Blog - July 11th, 2012

The Telegraph’s Thomas Pascoe reported Thursday:
One decision stands out as downright bizarre, however: the sale of the majority of Britain’s gold reserves for prices between $256 and $296 an ounce ….
When Brown decided to dispose of almost 400 tonnes of gold between 1999 and 2002, he did two distinctly odd things.
First, he broke with convention and announced the sale well in advance, giving the market notice that it was shortly to be flooded and forcing down the spot price. This was apparently done in the interests of “open government”, but had the effect of sending the spot price of gold to a 20-year low, as implied by basic supply and demand theory.
Second, the Treasury elected to sell its gold via auction. Again, this broke with the standard model. The price of gold was usually determined at a morning and afternoon “fix” between representatives of big banks whose network of smaller bank clients and private orders allowed them to determine the exact price at which demand met with supply.
The auction system again frequently achieved a lower price than the equivalent fix price. The first auction saw an auction price of $10c less per ounce than was achieved at the morning fix. It also acted to depress the price of the afternoon fix which fell by nearly $4.
It seemed almost as if the Treasury was trying to achieve the lowest price possible for the public’s gold. It was.
One of the most popular trading plays of the late 1990s was the carry trade, particularly the gold carry trade.
In this a bank would borrow gold from another financial institution for a set period, and pay a token sum relative to the overall value of that gold for the privilege.
Once control of the gold had been passed over, the bank would then immediately sell it for its full market value. The proceeds would be invested in an alternative product which was predicted to generate a better return over the period than gold which was enduring a spell of relative price stability, even decline.
At the end of the allotted period, the bank would sell its investment and use the proceeds to buy back the amount of gold it had originally borrowed. This gold would be returned to the lender. The borrowing bank would trouser the difference between the two prices.
This plan worked brilliantly when gold fell and the other asset – for the bank at the heart of this case, yen-backed securities – rose. When the prices moved the other way, the banks were in trouble.
This is what had happened on an enormous scale by early 1999. One globally significant US bank in particular is understood to have been heavily short on two tonnes of gold, enough to call into question its solvency if redemption occurred at the prevailing price.
Goldman Sachs, which is not understood to have been significantly short on gold itself, is rumoured to have approached the Treasury to explain the situation through its then head of commodities Gavyn Davies, later chairman of the BBC and married to Sue Nye who ran Brown’s private office.
Faced with the prospect of a global collapse in the banking system, the Chancellor took the decision to bail out the banks by dumping Britain’s gold, forcing the price down and allowing the banks to buy back gold at a profit, thus meeting their borrowing obligations.
I spoke with Peter Hambro, chairman of Petroplavosk and a leading figure in the London gold market, late last year and asked him about the rumours above.
“I think that Mr Brown found himself in a terrible position,” he said.
“He was facing a problem that was a world scale problem where a number of financial institutions had become voluntarily short of gold to the extent that it was threatening the stability of the financial system and it was obvious that something had to be done.”
***
Responsibility is evaded by all bar those on whose shoulders it ought to rest. The gold panic of 1999 was expensively paid for by the British public.
JP Morgan was wildly short gold in 1999.  See this and this.  As Reginald Howe has noted:
Prior to 1999, [JP] Morgan had never held more than about $20 billion in total gold derivatives, nor more than 28% of the total outstanding for all banks. But beginning in the second quarter of 1999 [before Brown announced the British gold sales], Morgan took on a much larger role in the under-one-year maturities, possibly presaging the the British gold sales. Then, during the last half of 1999, Morgan more than doubled its total gold derivatives, taking them from $18.4 billion to $38.1 billion, which amounted to 43% of the total for all U.S. banks reporting to the Comptroller of the Currency. What is more, Morgan’s over 40% dominance stretched across all maturities. In the fourth quarter alone, it increased its gold derivatives with maturities over one year by more than 80% to $17.1 billion from $9.4 billion.
(Citi was the third American bank with a huge short gold position in 1999, trailing JP Morgan with the biggest position and Goldman with the second largest.)
But would government employees actually manipulate the price of gold?
Yes, actually.  As Fed chairman Alan Greenspan said in official remarks in 1998:
Private counterparties in oil contracts have virtually no ability to restrict the worldwide supply of this commodity. (Even OPEC has been less than successful over the years.) Nor can private counterparties restrict supplies of gold, another commodity whose derivatives are often traded over-the-counter, where central banks stand ready to lease gold in increasing quantities should the price rise.
Many other governmental sources have confirmed gold manipulation as well.
As CNBC reports today:
Gold may have been manipulated like the London interbank rate or Libor over a long time frame, Ned Naylor-Leyland, investment director at Cheviot [with around $300 million under management], told CNBC.
The scandal surrounding the fixing of the Libor has opened markets up to “more scrutiny and more investigation,” Naylor-Leyland said.
He expects to see revelations over the next few months that the price of gold was also manipulated because “gold and silver reflect the true value of money the same way interest rates do.”
“It is effectively an intervention in two ways; one would be the fact that for central banks, gold and silver going up doesn’t make their currency look any good, and secondly a number of the big commercial banks have very large short positions which they like to manage and make easy money from,” he said.
***
Chris Powell, Secretary and Treasurer of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee told CNBC in June that “as central banks are interested in supporting government bonds and the dollar and keeping interest rates low, they continue to manipulate the gold market”.

Like a Lead Zeppelin


From The Daily Reckoning,
07/10/12 Laguna Beach, California – The German government, a AAA-borrower, is more likely to default than Viacom, a “near junk” borrower. At least, that’s what the credit default swap (CDS) market is saying. The CDS market may be wrong, of course, but it probably isn’t crazy.
The AAA German government is bearing a very heavy burden these days, thanks to its financially challenged Eurozone companions. As a result of this burden — both immediate and prospective — the cost of insuring a 5-year German bond against default is higher than the cost of insuring a 5-year Viacom bond against a default.
Price of Insuring AAA-Rated German Bonds vs. Insuring Near-Junk Viacom Bonds
How could this be?
The answer is simple: Germany has become the “rich guy” in a group of friends who are dining at an expensive restaurant. Prior to the meal, everyone assumed that each friend would pay his share of the bill. (Each friend, that is, besides Greece. That dude never pays).
But now that the meal is over, almost no one is reaching for his wallet. Greece “stepped out for a smoke,” Spain “went to the restroom,” Italy “excused himself to take an urgent phone call.” Meanwhile, most of the other diners are shuffling nervously through their wallets, mumbling about not finding the credit card they are looking for.
And there, at the head table, sits a forlorn Germany — platinum Amex card in hand — dreading the fate he knows is coming his way. That’s why investors are pricing insurance on Germany’s AAA debt at BBB levels.
AAA borrowers, according to Standard & Poor’s, possess “extremely strong capacity to meet financial commitments,” whereas BBB borrowers like Viacom possess merely “Adequate capacity to meet financial commitments, but [are] more subject to adverse economic conditions.”
Like a textbook AAA borrower, Germany possesses an “extremely strong capacity to meet financial commitments.” Unfortunately, those commitments are going parabolic…which means that Germany’s robust balance sheet is as “subject to adverse economic conditions” as a textbook BBB borrower.
At last count, Germany was on the hook for about €1.5 trillion of direct and contingent liabilities. For starters, as James Grant, editor of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, explains, “There’s the money that the German government has pledged to defend the euro. Such commitments — promised but yet undrawn — include €22 billion for the first Greek bailout, €211 billion for the European Financial Stability Facility, €190 billion for the European Stability Mechanism, €12 billion for the European Financial Stabilization Mechanism and $40 billion for the Securities Markets Program. They sum up to €475 billion, or 18% of German GDP.”
Next up, the Bundesbank is facing another €698.6 billion of exposure to various peripheral European central banks. That exposure derives from an obscure credit facility known as the Trans-European Automated Real-Time Gross Settlement Express Transfer System — i.e., “Target2.” The Bundesbank’s Target2 balances soared to €698.6 billion in May… from €644.2 billion in April,” Grant observes, “and next to nothing in 2006.”
Bundesbank's Target2 Balances in Euros and As a Percent of German GDP
Meanwhile, over in the private sector, German banks are sitting on about €323 billion of exposure to Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Italy.
So when you tally up all these acronyms, direct loans, backdoor guarantees and cryptic credit facilities, Germany’s total exposure to its beleaguered Eurozone neighbors soars to €1.5 trillion! That’s a staggering sum of money, equal to more than half of German GDP.
And remember, not a single one of these credit facilities is financing domestic German enterprise; they are simply trust-me lifelines to foreign economies with a long, checkered history of debt-repayment…or more typically, debt-non-repayment.
“Markets are beginning to latch on to the fact that, in effect, Germany is the euro and the euro is Germany,” observes Evan Lorenz, a research analyst at Grant’s Interest Rate Observer.
That’s the reason, Lorenz surmises, why insuring AAA-rated German debt against a default now costs 100 basis points per year, which is higher than the cost of insuring BBB+ rated Viacom (92 basis points) and double the cost of insuring AA+ rated US Treasurys.
Curiously, German government bonds remain the go-to safe haven asset on the European Continent. The 10-year bund yields a skimpy 1.32% — well below the 10-year US Treasury’s 1.52% yield.
Thus, dear investor, we have an anomaly, a conundrum. The folks buying credit insurance consider German bonds twice as risky as US Treasurys. But the folks buying the actual bonds, consider German bonds less risky than Treasurys. Here’s our guess: Someone is right.
Whatever the outcome, risks to Germany’s national balance sheet are clearly on the rise. If these risks continue to rise, Germany’s high-flying bond market may start flying like a lead Zeppelin.
Regards,
Author Image for Eric Fry

Eric Fry

Eric J. Fry, Agora Financial’s Editorial Director, has been a specialist in international equities for nearly two decades. He was a professional portfolio manager for more than 10 years, specializing in international investment strategies and short-selling.  Following his successes in professional money management, Mr. Fry joined the Wall Street-based publishing operations of James Grant, editor of the prestigious Grant's Interest Rate Observer. Working alongside Grant, Mr. Fry produced Grant's International and Apogee Research —  institutional research products dedicated to international investment opportunities and short selling. 
Mr. Fry subsequently joined Agora Inc., as Editorial Director. In this role, Mr. Fry  supervises the editorial and research processes of numerous investment letters and services. Mr. Fry also publishes investment insights and commentary under his own byline as Editor of The Daily Reckoning. Mr. Fry authored the first comprehensive guide to investing internationally with American Depository Receipts.  His views and investment insights have appeared in numerous publications including TimeBarron'sWall Street JournalInternational Herald TribuneBusiness WeekUSA Today,Los Angeles Times and Money.

Labels

"backyard" "bank holiday" "Change" "Jewish Achievements" 1st Amendment 2nd amendment 4GW 4th Reich 7/7 9/11 abiotic oil abuses of power ACTA Afghanistan AfPak Africa AFRICOM agenda 21 al-CIAduh alternative currencies American revolution anarchy apocalypse Argentina ARTICHOKE Asia Asian Energy Security Grid assassinations asteroids austerity AWOL ballistic missiles B/S backfire bad cops bailout bailout scam bank nazionalization banksters big oil big pharma Bilderberg Bin Laden biofuels biological warfare biological weapons biological weapons research bioterrorism bird flu bitcoins black ops Blackwater Brazil BRICs Brzezinski bubbles cap and trade capitalism carbon credits carbon tax carbon trade cash nexus cass sunstein casus belli CDS Central Asia central banks CFR Cheney China CIA CIA assets civil wars class conflicts class structure class warfare climategate COINTELPRO collapse Color revolutions COMEX default communism community currencies Congo conspiracies conspiracy theories Constitution Copyright corporate "personhood" corporate law corporatocracy corruption countercoup counterinsurgency Coup D'etat covert agents covert operations covert ops covert war covert warfare coverup crazy lone gunmen crimes against humanity currencies currency war dancing israelis David Kelly dead microbiologists death squads debt debt bondage debt bubble debt monetization debtors' prisons deep politics default deficit deflation deglobalization deindustralization deja vu delocalization democracy depleted uranium depopulation depression deregulation derivatives detentions Detroit devaluation devolution dictatorship Dimitri Khalezov dirty tricks dirty wars disaster capitalism disaster management discovery disinformation dissent diy diy currencies DMCA drones drugs trade DU dystopias eastern europe ECB eco-fascism economic cycle economic hitmen economic warfare Egypt electromagnetic weapons electronic surveillance elite consensus elitist propaganda Ellen Brown emerging markets end game energy engineered clusterfuck Ethiopia EU EU666 eugenics euro eurocracy eurocrats europe fake bonds fake democracy fake gold fake revolutions fake terrorism false flags fascism fascism 2.0 FED FEMA FEMA death camps fiat money Finance Capitalism forecasts ForeclosureGate foreclosures FOREIGN TRADE ZONES Fort Detrick fractional reserve banking France fraudclosures fraudonomics frauds Free books free money free speech freedom Fukushima funny money G20 gatekeepers Gaza genocides geoengineering Geopolitics Germany Ghana ghost towns Gladio global currency Global warming hoax globalization GMO gold gold manipulation gold standard Goldman Sachs golpe google Grand Chessboard great depression 2.0 great game Greece Green shoots greenbackers Guantanamo Gulf of Tonkin gun ban gun control Guns H.R. 45 HAARP habeas corpus hackers Haiti Halliburton happiness health health care bill health care reform hemp heroin high frequency trading historical cycles history hitler hoaxes Honduras House Bill 1796 how-to human organs trafficking human rights Hungary hunger hyperinflation ICC Iceland Illuminati IMF imf riots immigration imperialism incoherence income distribution income tax India inequalities infiltration inflation inflationary depression information war insider trading insolvency instability insurgency intelligence International Criminal Court international political economy internet censorship internet warfare ior IP IPCC Iran Iraq Ireland IRS Israel israeli assets Israeli firsters Israeli killers israeli lobby Israeli Organ Harvesting israeli terrorism italy Ivory Coast jesuits jews JFK Jim Willie JPM k-waves Kazakhstan Keynesianism Kissinger kleptocracy Kosovo Krugman KUBARK Kurt Sonnenfeld Kyrgyzstan Land Grab Large Hadron Collider Larry Summers Latin America LBMA Lee Harvey Oswald legitimacy crisis legitimation lesser evilism Libya lies Limited Hang Out Lincoln Lisbon Treaty lobbying local currencies Lockerbie Logan Act lol looting lsd mafia Mali Manchurian candidates Mandatory vaccinations maquiladoras market manipulations martial law Martin Armstrong Medicare meltdown MENA Mend mercenaries Mexico MI5 Michael Chertoff Michael Hudson Middle East migrations Military Industrial Complex military research military spending military tribunals militias mind control mind tricks Minerva Research Initiative Minot missing nukes missile defense missing pathogens MKDELTA MKNAOMI MKSEARCH MKULTRA money money as debt money laundering money supply Mongolia monsanto Montenegro morgellons mossad msm Mumbai narco-states narcodollars narcotics national debt National Emergencies Act national emergency native Americans NATO NDAA neo-Malthusians neocolonialism neocons neofeudalism neuroscience NGOs Nigeria NLP Non-lethal Weapons Noriega North Korea Norway NSA NSPD-51 nuclear demolition nukes NWO odious debt Oil OKLAHOMA CITY bombing oligarchy OOTW Operation Ajax operation CONDOR Operation Fast and Furious operation Mockingbird Operation Northwoods operation paperclip Operation Strange Man opium Orwell outrages p2p currencies Pakistan Palestine Panama Panarin pandemics paper money Paraguay paranoia paranoia pimping patents Patriot Act patsies pauperization peak oil pearl harbor Pennsylvania pensions Pentagon persuasion Peru pervs philippines Phoenix program piigs pimping Pipelinestan piracy Pirates plagues planned disasters Plum Island plutocracy PMCs PNAC poison pills Poland police state political economy political fakeries polls ponzi schemes pork Posse Comitatus Act pot poverty poverty business power elite pr0n predictive programming prepping primitive accumulation prison industrial complex prison population private debt privatizations problem-solution prohibitionism Project Artichoke Project Bluebird Project Censored Project MK/NAOMI Project Mockingbird project monarch Prompt Corrective Action Law propaganda prostitution protests provocateurs psy-ops psycho-police psychotronic warfare Ptech public policies qe qe2 R2P rabbis crackdown real wages regime change regulations relative disadvantage religion renditions renewable energy reserve currency resistance revolution revolution (how to) revolutions riots robots Rockfeller Roman Empire Rothschilds Rumsfeld Rupert Murdoch Russia Rwanda s510 sabbateans Salvador Option samson option saudi arabia sayanim SCADs scams scandals scares schemes SCO SDR secrecy secret algorithms Secret services sedition self-employment self-reliance serial killers sex scandals sheeple shock capitalism SHTF silver sixties slavery slums social conflicts social currencies social movements social research Social Security social spending socialization of costs somalia Soros sound money South Africa South Caucasus South Korea Southern Poverty Law Center Sovereignty Sovereignty Resolutions spain special economic zones spin spyware stagflation state of exception state secrets state terrorism statistics stimulus stuxnet submarines subprime Sudan suicides superbugs superimperialism suppressed technologies supremacist racist genocidal apocalyptic cults surveillance Survivalism SVADs sweden Swine Flu syria Taliban Tamiflu TAPI taxes tea party technocracy Tennessee TEOTWAWKI terrorism Thailand The Fourth Turning the left The Mogambo Guru Thirdworldization TIPS tiranny torture totalitarism toxic assets toxic waste trade deficit trade war treason Treasuries Bubble Tri-Border Area Trickle down trolls tsa tunisia Turkey uganda UK Ukraine UN underclass upper class US $ US army US bonds seized US debt US elections US gulags US hunger US secessionists US Treasuries US666 useful idiots vaccines VAT vatican Venezuela vets vietghanistan Vietnam violent conflicts virii Voodoo war war crimes WAR CRIMINALS war on drugs war party war pimps war propaganda warfare warfare state wars water WB wealth distribution web bot weed Weimar weird welfare white collar criminals White phosphorous WHO who rules Wikileaks wikipedia witch hunt WMD working poors world bank world economy world hegemony world reserve currency world trade WTF WTO WW3 xe Xinjiang Yemen Yuan Yugoslavia Zimbabwe zionism zionist trolls zious
Protect Your ASSets: Buy Gold or Silver NOW - If you wait you will be late.
(He who panics first, just may salvage something.